Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Audit: Cheektowaga "Wasted" Thousands in Public Money

  1. #1
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975

    Audit: Cheektowaga "Wasted" Thousands in Public Money

    Audit: Cheektowaga "Wasted" Thousands in Public Money

    TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA – A state audit released this month blasted the Town of Cheektowaga for mishandling public works contracts and "wasting" hundreds of thousands of dollars, in one case potentially costing taxpayers an extra $600,000 by choosing an inappropriate bid for sidewalk replacement.



    http://www.wgrz.com/story/news/local...laims/7994205/

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,556
    Jerry said different taxing districts get audited by the state, so I guess then that this means it's ok? What a joke!

  3. #3
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    The audit, conducted by State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli's office, also criticized the town for appearing to "structure and award a bid for public works projects inappropriately." According to the audit, which analyzed the period between Jan. 1, 2010 and Aug. 28, 2013, the town "did not properly award" two contracts for both public works and a sidewalk replacement, which resulted in unfavorable contracts that "failed to act in the best interest of the taxpayers."
    I have been saying this all along.

    In particular, the audit said the town "wasted thousands of dollars by deciding to use more expensive bulldozers when other equally capable options were available at much lower costs." In another instance, the audit said the town board "paid more than necessary for sidewalk replacement… a significant portion of the additional cost was borne by individual taxpayers." The audit slammed the town for paying $5 or more per square foot to install four-inch sidewalks, instead of 10 cents per square foot for six-inch sidewalks. In all, the audit revealed that taxpayers could have saved about $600,000, had the town installed six-inch sidewalks.
    How could this be?

    $5 a sqr for 4" versus 10 cents for 6" ?

  4. #4
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Cost of Cheektowaga sidewalk contract faulted in state audit

    The Town of Cheektowaga overpaid for sidewalk replacement by $600,000, with individual property owners picking up a significant portion of the tab, according to a state audit critical of the way the town handles contracts.

    The audit has raised even more serious issues for Council Member Angela M. Wozniak. The recently declared candidate for the Assembly questions whether “pay-to-play” is involved.

    Released last Friday, the audit by the State Comptroller’s Office covered the period Jan. 1, 2010, to Aug. 28, 2013, and reviewed five contracts for goods and services that totaled $12.6 million.
    Read the full story in the Buffalo News

    In the response, Supervisor Mary F. Holtz – who was absent from Monday’s meeting – explained that it has been the town’s practice to replace 4-inch-thick sidewalks with 4-inch-thick sidewalks. Six-inch-thick sidewalks were intended to be placed only in commercial areas or at driveway crossings where heavy vehicles would be driving over such sidewalks.

    “We agree that the bid specifications should have clarified this,” Holtz wrote.

    “In summary, the Town of Cheektowaga acted in good faith and in the best interests of the taxpayers with respect to utilizing public works contracts for the road reconstruction projects.

    With the in-house use of town employees in connection with these projects, the town saved taxpayer money.

    The audit can be viewed at www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/. Click on “Audits of Local Governments,” then “Most Recent Audits.”
    how so if the town ended up spending $5 per sqr versus 10 cents per square?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,556
    From the report:


    We find it highly irregular that a contractor would bid a significantly
    lower price for the six-inch sidewalks than for four-inch sidewalks.
    This helped drive this contractor to be selected as the low bidder.
    When this is coupled with the junior engineer electing to have the
    thinner − yet more expensive − sidewalks installed, we find this
    highly questionable

  6. #6
    Member Riven37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Town of Cheektowaga
    Posts
    5,147
    Nothing will come out of this except for a few minor changes in the progress with the way they make up contractors contracts and bidding that's all; business as usual.
    Riven37
    _________
    All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Thomas Jefferson

  7. #7
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Roman View Post
    Jerry said different taxing districts get audited by the state, so I guess then that this means it's ok? What a joke!
    That sort of was a non-answer by Jerry.

    What does having the audits published on a Saturday have to do with anything? Jerry made a valid point. "past practice" Let us all review. The Cheektowaga Democratic Party has given us all the players that have created all the "past practicing" isn't that right Nogods?

    When the reporter asked Angela should she share some of the blame for this I thought that was odd. She was just elected and prob has no access to anything with purchasing or the bidding process. Right? Very good she brings issues like this up.

  8. #8
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Renewal of that contract and the award of one for sidewalk replacement, to a different company, were tabled Monday night on a motion by Wozniak that was seconded by Council Member Diane M. Benczkowski.
    This was good.

  9. #9
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Go read this:

    http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/...heektowaga.pdf


    Town officials also paid more for certain services than necessary
    without valid explanation. O
    I have two possible explanations...

    It is either criminal or we simply do not have qualified people running our town.

    Had the junior engineer required the contractor to install six-inch sidewalks (10 cents/square foot) rather than four-inch ($5/square foot), the total cost would have been only $12,100, saving approximately $600,000. In addition, the Town has a cost-sharing policy for sidewalk replacement, where property owners pay for a substantial portion of the cost. Therefore, a significant amount of this additional cost was borne by individual taxpayers for sidewalk replaced on their property

    We find it highly irregular that a contractor would bid a signi ficantly lower price for the six-inch sidewalks than for four-inch sidewalks. This helped drive this contractor to be selected as the low bidder. When this is coupled with the junior engineer electing to have the thinner−yet more expensive−sidewalks installed, we find this highly questionable.

    This waste of taxpayer money occurred because the Town Engineer failed to exercise proper oversight of the construction contract bid process or adequately supervise the management of the projects. Had the Town Engineer instructed the contractor to install the more durable−yet significantly less costly−six-inch sidewalks, the Town would have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars.
    I wonder what the people who made this decision would have picked for sidewalks if they were spending their very own money.

  10. #10
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Go to page 22:

    http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/...heektowaga.pdf


    Think the response clears the issue up?

  11. #11
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,155
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Go to page 22:

    http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/...heektowaga.pdf


    Think the response clears the issue up?


    Doesn't Max read his contracts for solid waste disposal? Why does the town board approve payments "willie-nillie"? Don't they some kind of payment audit process prior to paying out claims?

    Georgia L Schlager

  12. #12
    Member nogods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    9,330
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Go to page 22:

    http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/...heektowaga.pdf


    Think the response clears the issue up?
    Holtz isn't a Mensa member.

    Her claim that if the town had acted in a responsible fiscal manner then the contractor would have abandoned the job is proof enough that the town hired the wrong contractor to begin with. She needs to think through her responses before presenting them.

    It's like her claim that the unions won't let the town change the way the town provides services to taxpayers. Apparently she thinks the unions and contractors are in charge. If she runs again, the voters should let her know otherwise.

  13. #13
    Member Frank Broughton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Oh, good grief...
    Posts
    6,406
    Quote Originally Posted by nogods View Post
    Holtz isn't a Mensa member.

    Her claim that if the town had acted in a responsible fiscal manner then the contractor would have abandoned the job is proof enough that the town hired the wrong contractor to begin with. She needs to think through her responses before presenting them.

    It's like her claim that the unions won't let the town change the way the town provides services to taxpayers. Apparently she thinks the unions and contractors are in charge. If she runs again, the voters should let her know otherwise.
    Oh boy... nice try dogman.
    The above is opinion & commentary, I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights as a US citizen. Posts are NOT made with any malicious intent.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    765
    What company is only charging 10cents a square foot for concrete work?....NO ONE!....I would do my driveway, garage floor, sidewalks and a new patio if it was that cheap.... 1000 sq ft 6in thick for $100!!! count me in!!

  15. #15
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,975
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Broughton View Post
    Oh boy... nice try dogman.
    Did you read his post before commenting?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 2nd, 2013, 08:43 PM
  2. Is wrong to spend grant money to "save" money when there are no savings?
    By WNYresident in forum Albany NY State budget Capital and Governor Kathy Hochul
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 5th, 2012, 11:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •