If a woman can arbitrarily choose to not be responsible for her child by aborting it, eliminating all need for care of the child as it grows up, why can't a man choose to not be responsible by refusing to pay child support in the same way?
If a woman can arbitrarily choose to not be responsible for her child by aborting it, eliminating all need for care of the child as it grows up, why can't a man choose to not be responsible by refusing to pay child support in the same way?
Let me articulate this for you:
"I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
HipKat's Blog
The man's choice in the matter ends with whether or not he puts on a condom.
He can make suggestions, like abortion, adoption, selling it on the black market for crack....
But, in the final analysis, if he didn't use contraception or the contraception failed, it's his kid and he needs to follow the mothers wishes.
Interestingly - a concept I got from the book Freakanomics.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4674897.stmThen there is Levitt's economic analysis of abortion and crime rates, which has rattled America. He claims that Bill Clinton's apocalyptic warning of a crime wave in the 90s did not come to fruition because of Roe vs Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling of 1973 that legalised abortion in the USA.
He argues that the women most likely to have taken advantage of Roe vs Wade were poor and unmarried, whose kids - if they had been born - would apparently have "led unhappy and possibly criminal lives".
Do you see where the argument is heading? In a nutshell, Freakonomics claims that legalised abortion killed off many future criminals, using data to show that 20 years after Roe vs Wade there was a dip in the crime rates. It's a distasteful claim and it has stuck in the throats of many in the USA. But Levitt stands by it.
the book is a fascinating read.... even if it is totally un-PC.
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas Gandhi
That all seems hypocritical. There is birth control methods that women can use too, so why does it default to the man's responsibility?
Interesting statisitc on the crime rate thing.
Let me articulate this for you:
"I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
HipKat's Blog
Because the 50 State's realise they will probably become financially responsible for feeding (W.I.C./foodstamps), sheltering (Section 8), and providing healthcare (Medicare) for the children of fathers who decide not to pay child support. Makes better sense for them to enact laws that force the father to pay, rather then the State themselves.
Let me articulate this for you:
"I'm not locked in here with them. They're locked in here with me!!"
HipKat's Blog
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks