+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 109

Thread: Simple Question - Why?

  1. #46
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,652
    Quote Originally Posted by yokes View Post
    But in reality how many days did you take them there? Growing up I remember a couple trips to a musem, a couple to the zoo. Always a great time, but in reality its a small percentage of overall time. Does10 to 15 days out of thousands of days really have a major influence on a childs development? Don't know that I am sold on that.
    You remember those 10-15 days, don't you?
    So, it seems they like they left with some sort of impression.

    Anyway, when it comes to funding for the arts... it's also about the kids who are blessed with the talents to be tomorrow's artists. If you're willing to let the future of art die, then cut all the funding.

  2. #47
    Member Eat My Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Socialist States of Amerika
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    Right out of the holy then thou playbook.

    "The goverment subsidized things you use are free cheese the stuff I get is essential""

    Seriously man



    Since you asked I am a zoo member and last trip I dropped $20 at the science and history mueseum last year.

    How much have you contributed to your plowing and sheriffe patrols? Or do you like your free cheese, REALLY free?
    Now I get it.

    You enjoy the benefit of having the taxpayer subsidize the cost of your entertainment.

    Your argument is another "oranges and apples" argument.

    How does maintenance of publicly owned assets justify subsidizing private entities? I'll answer. It doesn't.

    Nor does subsidizing one private entitiy justify subsidizing others. It's wrong all the way around.

    If there's such value to these institutions, then people will be willing to pay for them. But, the sad reality is, that value isn't there and people aren't willing to pay for them so the elitists among us clamor for taxpayer handouts. Our spineless pols want to buy their votes with our money so they hand out the pork and spin it like we'll all devolve to cavemen if we don't support our glorious culturals.

    In the end, we're forced to support things with "public money" that we never would with our own...and that's just wrong.


    "I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008

    Transfixus sed non Mortuus

  3. #48
    Member Eat My Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Socialist States of Amerika
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post

    Anyway, when it comes to funding for the arts... it's also about the kids who are blessed with the talents to be tomorrow's artists. If you're willing to let the future of art die, then cut all the funding.
    It's always about the kids.

    The fact is that art is alive and well and will do just fine without a handout. It just might not be in the form the elitists want it to be. The artists of tomorrow who have been blessed with real talent will survive.

    It amazes me how there's this pervasive mentality that artists are somehow deserving of subsidies. I mean, why not subsidize that talented lawyer who no one will hire or that pizzeria that no one wants to eat at and maybe we could kick a little to that landscaper who does great work on my garden? After all, what about the kids who are blessed with legal minds or culinary skills or green thumbs but just cant get a break? And how about me? Can I get some? My boss doesnt appreciate my real talent, but that doesn't mean the public shouldn't...

    Government subsidized art is just crap that no one will buy. Government subsidized artists are just another tier of talentless leeches with their hands in my wallet.


    "I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008

    Transfixus sed non Mortuus

  4. #49
    Unregistered Cgoodsp466's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    8,321
    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post
    You remember those 10-15 days, don't you?
    So, it seems they like they left with some sort of impression.

    Anyway, when it comes to funding for the arts... it's also about the kids who are blessed with the talents to be tomorrow's artists. If you're willing to let the future of art die, then cut all the funding.


    Let it friggin die.We aint got the money Honey

  5. #50
    Member Save Us's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,349
    Was reading the editorials today, It appears that there are increasing numbers of people that are calling for our leaders and public employees to take a pay cut, decrease and tax their benefits.

    Maybe their would be enough for the people that want these things if our leaders and public servants shared the pain!

  6. #51
    Member steven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Side!
    Posts
    9,541
    Its the facts kiddies. You can try to justify your free cheese all you want just don't lie to yourself and think your not wolfing down a big bowl of it everyday you drive on your county road to your favorite strip mall, or when your peeking out your window praying for a county snow plow to come by.

    Not to mention when you dial 911 and hear a cheerful, " Erie county Sheriffs Office may I help you"

    I don't like it anymore than you. If I had it my way all county plowing of towns and villages would stop, Why should I pay for your plowing because you want to live out in East Yuhunga? The money saved on maintenance and plowing probably dwarfs by millions what the zoo and museums get.

    All sheriff patrols would stop, Buy your own police force like the rest of us and we wont be paying salaries to cops that just take even more of our money into retirement down in Florida with them.

    Close everything, get rid of the Bills, Sabres and every cultural in the county and dont forget the librarys who the heck needs their kids to read after all?


    Stop the free cheese. ALL the free cheese. Budgets are not done in a vacuum. When things are cut everything that doe not benefit all tax paying residents should be on the table.

    Then guess what?

    No one will live here and you can complain about free cheese where ever you happen to move to.
    “I used the church to bring people to atheism"
    Jim Jones

  7. #52
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,278
    ^^ Post reflects my view as well. The I don't use it so I shouldn't fund it mentality is ridiculous. I was just at the Science Museum yesterday, and it should be doing a *better* job than it does, not getting a budget cut.

  8. #53
    Member raoul duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    soup line
    Posts
    4,304
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    Its the facts kiddies. You can try to justify your free cheese all you want just don't lie to yourself and think your not wolfing down a big bowl of it everyday you drive on your county road to your favorite strip mall, or when your peeking out your window praying for a county snow plow to come by.

    Not to mention when you dial 911 and hear a cheerful, " Erie county Sheriffs Office may I help you"
    I can mostly agree with that sentiment.
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    I don't like it anymore than you. If I had it my way all county plowing of towns and villages would stop, Why should I pay for your plowing because you want to live out in East Yuhunga? The money saved on maintenance and plowing probably dwarfs by millions what the zoo and museums get.

    All sheriff patrols would stop, Buy your own police force like the rest of us and we wont be paying salaries to cops that just take even more of our money into retirement down in Florida with them.

    Close everything, get rid of the Bills, Sabres and every cultural in the county and dont forget the librarys who the heck needs their kids to read after all?


    Stop the free cheese. ALL the free cheese. Budgets are not done in a vacuum. When things are cut everything that doe not benefit all tax paying residents should be on the table.

    Then guess what?

    No one will live here and you can complain about free cheese where ever you happen to move to.
    And we would probably move a lot as Third World societies tend to be very unstable.
    One beautiful thing about having a government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations is that every disaster is measured in terms of economic loss. It's sort of like getting your arm sheared off in a car accident and thinking, "Damn, now it'll take longer to fold the laundry" as blood spurts from your arteries. - The Rude Pundit

  9. #54
    Unregistered Enough's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    ^^ Post reflects my view as well. The I don't use it so I shouldn't fund it mentality is ridiculous. I was just at the Science Museum yesterday, and it should be doing a *better* job than it does, not getting a budget cut.
    I don't think it's even an issue of using it or not, it's a simple fact of economics. Don't know if you've been watching the news or not but we're broke, broke, broke!

    At some point we are going to have to face certain realities that we are over-taxed and losing population. The burden we are putting on taxpayers keeps getting greater and greater!

    HOW do you suggest we keep subsidizing all these entities and programs? If you want it you have to figure out how to pay for it!

  10. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,278
    Let's see, people in rural areas could be required to have studded tires, reducing the necessity / frequency of plowing? There are many areas of *waste* to be addressed before these cuts are made. Cuts could be made to Sheriff's offices, I mean helicopters???? Honestly??

    I think steven's points are salient ones and don't require further elaboration.

    Why don't we also eliminate private sector jobs that create nothing or add no value and therefore drive up the cost of goods and services? If those costs were to drop, then people would have more money to spend and economic stimulation would take place.

  11. #56
    Unregistered Enough's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    Let's see, people in rural areas could be required to have studded tires, reducing the necessity / frequency of plowing? There are many areas of *waste* to be addressed before these cuts are made. Cuts could be made to Sheriff's offices, I mean helicopters???? Honestly??

    I think steven's points are salient ones and don't require further elaboration.

    Why don't we also eliminate private sector jobs that create nothing or add no value and therefore drive up the cost of goods and services? If those costs were to drop, then people would have more money to spend and economic stimulation would take place.
    .....and you could be required to go pick up your own goods from the farms in rural area's too!

    I know, weak argument, but no weaker than your's.

    Just like, we should close the holding center and let each town or village house their own inmates since it's probably less than 1% of the people from rural area's in the holding center......

  12. #57
    Member Eat My Gun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Socialist States of Amerika
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by Genoobie View Post
    Why don't we also eliminate private sector jobs that create nothing or add no value and therefore drive up the cost of goods and services? If those costs were to drop, then people would have more money to spend and economic stimulation would take place.
    You've got to be kidding me?

    Eliminate private sector jobs that add nothing and therefore drive up the cost of goods and services? Such as?

    It's already been done on a massive scale. Outsourcing, foreign manufacturing, mass layoffs, wage cuts, and the highest unemployment rates since Carter. The jobs you mention don't exist.

    Not to mention the obvious contradiction in your contention that eliminating jobs results in people having more money and therefore stimulates the economy. Study economics, it doesn't work that way.

    I can just picture Obama telling the American public that the economy needs fixing and, in order to get the economy thriving once again, he's seeking to eliminate jobs....

    Private sector jobs in particular are the lynchpin of an thriving economy because, unlike government jobs, they are a complete function of consumer demand. More importantly, when revenues and demand fall, private sector jobs are eliminated. The same isn't true of government jobs. When tax revenues drop, they are either financed through debt, or taxes are raised, both of which have a negative impact on the economy.


    "I won't live by rules that make no sense to me." - Evan Tanner 1971-2008

    Transfixus sed non Mortuus

  13. #58
    Member Save Us's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,349
    Why don't we cut the redundant government, pensions, and salaries first?

    I mean who works for whom? Why is the government and public service so well insulated from reality,

    oh hell, I agree cut the snot out of everything,, we're broke!

  14. #59
    Member Save Us's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,349
    Quote Originally Posted by Eat My Gun View Post
    You've got to be kidding me?

    Eliminate private sector jobs that add nothing and therefore drive up the cost of goods and services? Such as?

    It's already been done on a massive scale. Outsourcing, foreign manufacturing, mass layoffs, wage cuts, and the highest unemployment rates since Carter. The jobs you mention don't exist.

    Not to mention the obvious contradiction in your contention that eliminating jobs results in people having more money and therefore stimulates the economy. Study economics, it doesn't work that way.

    I can just picture Obama telling the American public that the economy needs fixing and, in order to get the economy thriving once again, he's seeking to eliminate jobs....

    Private sector jobs in particular are the lynchpin of an thriving economy because, unlike government jobs, they are a complete function of consumer demand. More importantly, when revenues and demand fall, private sector jobs are eliminated. The same isn't true of government jobs. When tax revenues drop, they are either financed through debt, or taxes are raised, both of which have a negative impact on the economy.
    He's not kidding you.

  15. #60
    Unregistered Cgoodsp466's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    8,321
    Quote Originally Posted by steven View Post
    Its the facts kiddies. You can try to justify your free cheese all you want just don't lie to yourself and think your not wolfing down a big bowl of it everyday you drive on your county road to your favorite strip mall, or when your peeking out your window praying for a county snow plow to come by.

    Not to mention when you dial 911 and hear a cheerful, " Erie county Sheriffs Office may I help you"

    I don't like it anymore than you. If I had it my way all county plowing of towns and villages would stop, Why should I pay for your plowing because you want to live out in East Yuhunga? The money saved on maintenance and plowing probably dwarfs by millions what the zoo and museums get.

    All sheriff patrols would stop, Buy your own police force like the rest of us and we wont be paying salaries to cops that just take even more of our money into retirement down in Florida with them.

    Close everything, get rid of the Bills, Sabres and every cultural in the county and dont forget the librarys who the heck needs their kids to read after all?


    Stop the free cheese. ALL the free cheese. Budgets are not done in a vacuum. When things are cut everything that doe not benefit all tax paying residents should be on the table.

    Then guess what?

    No one will live here and you can complain about free cheese where ever you happen to move to.
    You are such a chump,Guess what Steve nobody is living here now! And the free cheese runs like water. I will say this one more time so even the great Steve can understand it. Everything can be privateized except.

    {1} You can drive a fire truck

    {2} You qualify to wear a badge

    {3} You qualify to wear a uniform and kill Hodgie.

    Now the rest I am sure some hard working private company could do.

    How About Acme Snow Plowing

    I cant get a date Clerical staffing

    Big Johnson Garbage pickup.

    Shall I go on or have you got the drift of things Stevy?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. $903,000 Question
    By blockclubof1 in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: January 21st, 2009, 09:22 AM
  2. Serious question regarding our currency.
    By FMD in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: January 1st, 2009, 03:41 PM
  3. Buffalo Casino: A very simple question
    By therising in forum Issues concerning Indian Sovereignty, Land Claims and Casinos
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: September 30th, 2006, 11:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts