The purpuse of this law is the protection of the public and not to punish the officer in which a proceeding based on it is brought against. So the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence as typically utilized in civil cases rather than beyond a reasonable doubt standard used in criminal prosecutions.
It is interesting the reaction of some reading something more into my original post than was there. It piques my curiosity as to whether or not something is afoot.



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks