Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: What is the definition of a libtard?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Yankeefan2009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,234

    What is the definition of a libtard?

    This word has been thrown around alot on these boards, so I figured I'd post the (un)official definition:

    Libtard - n. As repetitive as it sounds, it stands for "liberal retard." A libtard wants to live in a fantasy world (in which life is the way that they WISH IT WAS) as opposed to dealing with life the way it actually is. (This explains the religious fervor that many of them demonstrate when it comes to smoking pot).

    The most idealistic libtard envisions a time when science/technology and Socialism will eliminate all poverty, hunger, war, disease, injustice, unemployment and prejudice. (It is a nice pipe dream but human nature will forever stand in the way of that goal).

    Most libtards subscribe to the notion that "people are basically good", and build their foundation for activism and "improving the human condition" on that faulty premise. Because they deny the facts about human nature, their "reasoning" is diametrically opposite to common sense (blue states vs. red states).

    The reality that people have different initiative levels, are basically selfish, and often work for their own interests before helping others, puts a libtard's panties in a wad. So, when citizens will not voluntarily comply with various libtard prescriptions for "the common good", then laws must be passed, or force used, to MAKE them comply. (It is the gradual path to totalitarianism). Likewise, his/her naïve cries of: "can't we all just get along...


    http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...&defid=1454864
    Also see:

    "We're the country that built the Intercontinental Railroad." --Barack Obama

  2. #2
    Member NBuffaloResident's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,265
    So, basically, you think we should NOT work towards the goals of improving the human condition then?

    I think the premise is faulty, and proved as such with one example: Science has eliminated Polio and Small pox. And, given enough time and energy, why could the other items not be eliminated?

    Jobs for everyone would be easy: Science opens new areas of employment, and new resources to exploit. Science and technology can eventually end hunger, given enough time and energy devoted to things like increasing crop yields.
    Raptor Jesus: He went extinct for your sins.

  3. #3
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,947
    Quote Originally Posted by NBuffaloResident View Post
    So, basically, you think we should NOT work towards the goals of improving the human condition then?

    I think the premise is faulty, and proved as such with one example: Science has eliminated Polio and Small pox. And, given enough time and energy, why could the other items not be eliminated?

    Jobs for everyone would be easy: Science opens new areas of employment, and new resources to exploit. Science and technology can eventually end hunger, given enough time and energy devoted to things like increasing crop yields.
    Not when it includes destroying the futures of the humans who pay for it.

    I have no responsibility to pay health care of illegal aliens in NYC. Yet there is a hospital that advertises they will not turn you in if you are an illegal alien.

    There are 6 billion or more people on earth. You will never help everyone and it's stupid to even try to. It's impossible.

    There was a saying once... teach a person to fish versus handing him fish. I'm sick of paying for the fish.

  4. #4
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,947
    I think the premise is faulty, and proved as such with one example: Science has eliminated Polio and Small pox. And, given enough time and energy, why could the other items not be eliminated?

    Jobs for everyone would be easy: Science opens new areas of employment, and new resources to exploit. Science and technology can eventually end hunger, given enough time and energy devoted to things like increasing crop yields.
    Then tell me why is HUD building "moderate" income families 400k apartments that we pay for?

    it's a slap in the face to the people who bust their ass that get stuck with the bill.

    I'd rather see 60 mil go into research for something realistic.

  5. #5
    Member NBuffaloResident's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,265
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Not when it includes destroying the futures of the humans who pay for it.

    I have no responsibility to
    pay health care of illegal aliens in NYC. Yet there is a hospital that advertises they will not turn you in if you are an illegal alien.

    There are 6 billion or more people on earth. You will never help everyone and it's stupid to even try to. It's impossible.

    There was a saying once... teach a person to fish versus handing him fish. I'm sick of paying for the fish.
    How is improving the human condition destroying anything? That is a completely illogical statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Then tell me why is HUD building "moderate" income families 400k apartments that we pay for?

    it's a slap in the face to the people who bust their ass that get stuck with the bill.

    I'd rather see 60 mil go into research for something realistic.
    And, what the hell does that have to do with whether or not we can improve the human condition as a whole?
    Raptor Jesus: He went extinct for your sins.

  6. #6
    Member BorderBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident View Post
    Then tell me why is HUD building "moderate" income families 400k apartments that we pay for?
    Could it be that you are being raped by big business? You know, the ones that charge you (the taxpayers) 400K for those apartments.


    b.b.

  7. #7
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,947
    Quote Originally Posted by BorderBob View Post
    Could it be that you are being raped by big business? You know, the ones that charge you (the taxpayers) 400K for those apartments.


    b.b.
    No... Your being raped by the people who allow it to happen. HUD.. that little government department that Andrew was part of.

  8. #8
    Member mikenold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    7,594
    Quote Originally Posted by NBuffaloResident View Post
    So, basically, you think we should NOT work towards the goals of improving the human condition then?

    I think the premise is faulty, and proved as such with one example: Science has eliminated Polio and Small pox. And, given enough time and energy, why could the other items not be eliminated?

    Jobs for everyone would be easy: Science opens new areas of employment, and new resources to exploit. Science and technology can eventually end hunger, given enough time and energy devoted to things like increasing crop yields.
    There you go posting false information yet again!

    Science has NOT eliminated Polio and Small pox.

    Elimination and eradication are NOT the same thing!!

    Smallpox has been eradicated, NOT eliminated:
    Smallpox

    Smallpox was the first disease to be eradicated by human undertakings, and the only human infectious disease to have been eradicated so far. It became the first disease for which there was an effective vaccination.

    Polio has neither been eliminated nor eradicated:
    Poliomyelitis (polio)
























































    A dramatic reduction of the incidence

    of poliomyelitis in industrialized countries followed the development of a vaccine in the 1950s.


    Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eradica...tious_diseases

    The vaccine stockpile and its regular renewal will require financial investment until the risk of polio outbreaks has been reliably eliminated. Polio will join smallpox as the only infectious diseases to have been eradicated.
    Link: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?s...62004000100002


    **free is a trademark of the current U.S. government.

  9. #9
    Member Yankeefan2009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,234
    Mike wins.
    "We're the country that built the Intercontinental Railroad." --Barack Obama

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    Now's the time for the poster formerly known as BB to fess up and reveal that he never really went away.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    6,426
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankeefan2009 View Post
    This word has been thrown around alot on these boards, so I figured I'd post the (un)official definition:

    Libtard - n. As repetitive as it sounds, it stands for "liberal retard." A libtard wants to live in a fantasy world (in which life is the way that they WISH IT WAS) as opposed to dealing with life the way it actually is. (This explains the religious fervor that many of them demonstrate when it comes to smoking pot).

    The most idealistic libtard envisions a time when science/technology and Socialism will eliminate all poverty, hunger, war, disease, injustice, unemployment and prejudice. (It is a nice pipe dream but human nature will forever stand in the way of that goal).

    Most libtards subscribe to the notion that "people are basically good", and build their foundation for activism and "improving the human condition" on that faulty premise. Because they deny the facts about human nature, their "reasoning" is diametrically opposite to common sense (blue states vs. red states).

    The reality that people have different initiative levels, are basically selfish, and often work for their own interests before helping others, puts a libtard's panties in a wad. So, when citizens will not voluntarily comply with various libtard prescriptions for "the common good", then laws must be passed, or force used, to MAKE them comply. (It is the gradual path to totalitarianism). Likewise, his/her naïve cries of: "can't we all just get along...


    http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...&defid=1454864
    Also see:

    my definition; someone who likes to be insulting so long as he or she doesn't attach a real name.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The definition of a teabagger
    By FMD in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: October 1st, 2010, 09:09 PM
  2. When the Libtard media starts hammering you...
    By ILOVEDNY in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 20th, 2010, 12:16 PM
  3. Libtard Nov. Game plan.
    By ILOVEDNY in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 31st, 2010, 03:31 PM
  4. Clueless libtard
    By ILOVEDNY in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 19th, 2010, 10:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •