At the risk of living up to being a knuckelhead ....sharkey's posting of article 35 seems to support Cherry.
Depends on perspective in NY he is reckless, in Texas he would get a ticker tape parade.
personally I can see both sides, I would not have fired the weapon as the chances for a stray bullet could be disasterous, and the person was no longer a threat..if it were arson, rape, murder, you bet I would of emptied a clip in that car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Who knows maybe his wife was raped years ago, or this is the 20th time he has been robbed, or mugged.
depends on the mindset.
I saw something similar in the Buffalo News comments, and it does change some things, IMO, but I still don't think it clears him of some of the charges.
I still think that he could have easily killed one of those scumbags, which doesn't upset me, but it's still against the law to kill a simple burglar.
A normal AR-15 is semi-auto (one pull of the trigger fires one shot). But, you can pull the trigger on these really fast so shooting 15 shots can be done in only a few seconds.
The version of the AR-15 used by the military can be set to fire full auto (like a machine gun). A private citizen needs a special permit to own a full auto version. The big problem with the full auto version is the gun barrel will overheat very rapidly and this can damage the gun.
You don't want to damage one of these.....they aren't cheap.
Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem. Ronald Reagan
Military doesn't use the AR-15. It uses the M16A2 and M4, neither of which have full auto. They have 3 selections: Safe, Single, And Burst (3-round burst).
The only way to make either the M16A2 or M4 full auto is performing a mod on the trigger assy, which if your armorer discovers it, you will be in a heap of trouble.
The M249 SAW, however, fires .223 (AKA 5.56 mm), and does either belt-fed or magazine fed, and has full auto.
You have a great imagination.
You'll let your imagination run as wild as possible, looking for ways to defend the guy. If the story turns out that way (He was successful in disabling the vehicle,) I will be the first to admit I'm wrong.
If you actually believe in what you're saying, you wouldn't have to make up such nonsense as this.Originally Posted by chant
I find it laughable that Mr. Cherry is the one being demonized for protecting his home, while no one is saying anything about the low-lifes that tried to rob him.
From what I understand he has been robbed before. His handgun was stolen.
We all know that the person who got away wasn't going to be caught. He was assuring they would be by disabling the car. They were 15 shots at the car.
I don't want to hear any bleeding heart bs about the children possibly being hit and all that. I'm tired of it. The liberals have done a really good job of making good people evil.
http://www.buffaloreuse.org/~kool aid free zone~
http://www.buffaloreuse.org/~kool aid free zone~
Maybe if ny would just outlaw gun ownership all together, this wouldnt have happened.
Willful ignorance is the downfall of every major empire in history.
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao, 1938
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)