Maybe you all forgot...we had an election. Coumo and Obama won.
So lets see, you think that if your candidate is elected, then he or she should act in accordance with your wishes, but if the people who disagree with you elect their candidate, then the winer should still act in accordance with your wishes instead of the majority of voters that elected him or her
If you think that way, then you probably have a defense to the new 7-in-the-mag law - you can't count.
NO I do not.... I expect them to lead and do what is best FOR THE PEOPLE... not to foam at the mouth because of the orgasmic high they are getting from their abuse of power. They are a disgrace to America! Simply put and in reality a pawn of Satan. They are evil personified and I dare anyone prove otherwise. You cannot.
The above is opinion & commentary, I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights as a US citizen. Posts are NOT made with any malicious intent.
The above is opinion & commentary, I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights as a US citizen. Posts are NOT made with any malicious intent.
So some guy says he's not going to follow the 7 bullet rule on a chat board and he's at risk for losing his pp why? Is there a new intent clause in the law? If i say I'm going to go driving today and do 66 mph on the thruway, will a trooper show up at my door and pre issue me a ticket for that?
Until the state drafts an amendment to the new law, most of the Police Officers are Class E Felons. Their sidearm magazines and AR15 mags hold more than 7 rounds each.
IN GOD WE TRUST. THE POLITICIANS STILL HAVE TO EARN MY TRUST.
...like Antonin Scalia who wrote for the majority in DC V. Heller
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.
b.b.
Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more to it that that Mr Bob...
The above is opinion & commentary, I am exercising my 1st Amendment rights as a US citizen. Posts are NOT made with any malicious intent.
Do you really think these politicians is concerned about the next election ?
They guys are in bed with the powers that be, when they say jump these politicians say how high.
Depending on when the civil war takes place in America, elections and your vote might be the last thing they are concerned with.
This is a power grab, internal war in inevitable in America, they knew men were going to go crazy buying more guns, they just needed laws changed to give them a reason to slaughter you.
Wakeup people this isn't no game !!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)