Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: The Interview Poloncarz Doesn't want you to see.

  1. #16
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668


    Here is the interview

  2. #17
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668
    When the Buffalo Bills go and play a game in Toronto Erie County taxpayers still pay the Buffalo Bills 1,000,000,000 Dollars whether the game is in Orchard Park or not. So don't tell me this " who's paying for it rhetoric" most of us didn't even know this !

    We here in Buffalo historically has been stuck with people in the political arena who don't think we area city, but a small town in West Virginia to them and that's how they base their decision making. - Chris Stevenson
    Last edited by Bringthetruth; October 14th, 2012 at 09:21 AM.

  3. #18
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Bringthetruth View Post
    When the Buffalo Bills go and play a game in Toronto Erie County taxpayers still pay the Buffalo Bills 1,000,000,000 Dollars whether the game is in Orchard Park or not. So don't tell me this " who's paying for it rhetoric" most of us didn't even know this !

    We here in Buffalo historically has been stuck with people in the political arena who don't think we area city, but a small town in West Virginia to them and that's how they base their decision making. - Chris Stevenson
    The tax payers pay $1 billion dollars? How so?

  4. #19
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668
    I meant to say 1,000,000 dollars, why do you avoid the seriousness of the video but comment on a discrepancy ? Watxch the clip and get back to me , all your questions are answered in it.

  5. #20
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668
    All those who hate our tax dollars being wasted , plz address this crazy lease agreement of the bills that's in place now.

  6. #21
    Unregistered Bringthetruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,668
    The Final Arguments to Support a new Downtown Stadium

    10 Dec 2012 |











    by Pat Freeman
    The momentum to overturn 40 years of bad decisions in regards to a downtown stadium is now moving to their final arguments. When the campaign to accomplish this historic project started many doubted that an endeavor of this magnitude would gain traction in western New York . Well the effort to educate, and persuade the citizens of this region I believe has finally taken hold, and the nay-sayers are losing at this point… One of the principal arguments early in my involvement was how are you going to pay for this? Your ideas make sense but who is going to pay for this? Then I met Nick Stracick and George Hasiotis of the Greater Buffalo Sports and Entertainment Complex and the argument totally changed. When George and Nick shared with me their plans for building a state of the art complex which would include a 72,000 seat stadium with a retractable roof, convention center, hotel, retail space, and the North American Sports Child’s Interactive Museum operated by the world renown Strong Museum of Rochester, New York reinforced my confidence that this project really could happen. The road blocks for making this happen suddenly were pushed back because the GBSEC had already completed contemporary site studies, contracted a world class architectural firm HKS who have designed the last three stadiums that have hosted Super Bowls.
    After looking at five different locations the Outer Harbor was selected as the best site that met NFL specifications for new stadium development. The most important aspect of GBSEC was the financing of the complex which rivals just about every new stadium deal in the country. Most stadium deals are 35% Private and 65% Public and usually are accompanied by some form of tax increase. Not the GBSEC plan which is 70% Private financed and 30% Public with most of the public contribution associated with infrastructure improvements. The GBSEC has already invested about five years of work and well over 1 million dollars in site studies that would usually fall on municipalities to complete.
    Finally I believe the nay-sayer argument has shown very little validity with the argument for this project gaining support all over western New York. The only hold up is what will be the decision on the Outer Harbor land site? Will the NFTA do the right thing and deed the property back to the city, and then the city designate GBSEC as the developer? This is the only hold up with this project moving forward. This action alone will cost tax payers nothing!!!! The responsibility of development rests with GBSEC who can then work with city engineers in determining the planning of infrastructure improvements to make this site more accessible, and suitable for the proposed development.
    In closing you see this is why we are now moving towards the final argument in the case for this major downtown development that will change the landscape of the economy of western New York . My recent interview with Indianapolis Indiana Mayor Greg Ballard backs up the economic approach for team’s with NFL cities , and show’s why the proposed renovation of our existing stadium in Orchard Park, New York is a tax payer non- starter!!!!

  7. #22
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Bringthetruth View Post
    I meant to say 1,000,000 dollars, why do you avoid the seriousness of the video but comment on a discrepancy ? Watxch the clip and get back to me , all your questions are answered in it.


    Because I have basically watched our NYS/County/Local politics for the last 8 years. I have very little confidence in what they do. Specially when it comes to using our tax money in a responsible way.

    Not the GBSEC plan which is 70% Private financed and 30% Public with most of the public contribution associated with infrastructure improvements. The GBSEC has already invested about five years of work and well over 1 million dollars in site studies that would usually fall on municipalities to complete.
    If this was actually true then it would not be such a bad thing. If the 30% was physically infrastructure.

    I'm curious how much $200,000,000 or so buys in roads/sewers to support a stadium.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Investigative Post: Mark Poloncarz Interview
    By wgrz in forum Buffalo Bills Football and Buffalo Sabres Hockey
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 19th, 2012, 10:18 AM
  2. Is Mark Poloncarz Insane?
    By DigitalPanacea in forum Erie County Elections Democrats, Republicans, Independence, Conservatives
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: April 7th, 2007, 08:35 PM
  3. Mark Poloncarz..........
    By MR E S 1 in forum Erie County Elections Democrats, Republicans, Independence, Conservatives
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2007, 09:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •