Poll: Socialist Apathy

[Sylvan]

Just want to get an idea of who understands this:

Originally Posted by Sylvan
Voting republican is equally incompetent because the entire paradigm is socialist. And socialism IS the cause of an apathy far more dangerous to a civilization than instilling the priciples and courage to securing liberty and independence.

Pleae vote in the poll.

[LHardy]

Given big government republicans in office at this time the answer is yes.
McCain is a Republican socialist.

In and of itself is oxymoronic

[Genoobie]

I don't agree that socialism is necessarily a cause of apathy.

[LHardy]

I don't agree that socialism is necessarily a cause of apathy.

I agree.
Empathy would be a more appropriate word for this use.

[zanna vaida]

I hope this source will help you learn about all political parties and clear your minds: www.politics1.com

Do you home work and later, we can discuss your questions.

[raoul duke]

Man, this place just gets dumber and dumber.

[raoul duke]

Another thing that's funny. . . Most of you still don't seem to have the slightest clue as to what socialism is. The bailout is not socialist. If it was, the government would see a benefit.

[Sylvan]

I already know what socialism means and why I would be happy to kill it.

So why dont you, Raoul Duke and Zanna, just go ahead and tell me what you think socialism is and why you defend it without giving any of us your usual shady bull crap.

[zanna vaida]

Don't target me in the wrong circle.

Why do you think I'm here with capitalism? You know what happened to the USSR and why? Don't you?

[Sylvan]

Don't target me in the wrong circle.

Why do you think I'm here with capitalism? You know what happened to the USSR and why? Don't you?

Then you need to start making clear which side you are on when responding to a topic "before" you go on and on with answering questions with questions. You're not mothering children or selling a house here.

[qu1nn]

Another thing that's funny. . . Most of you still don't seem to have the slightest clue as to what socialism is. The bailout is not socialist. If it was, the government would see a benefit.

so·cial·ism (ssh-lzm)
n.
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

a free market would have allowed the corrupt organizations to fail, not force its citizens to bail them out.


qu1nn

[zanna vaida]

Then you need to start making clear which side you are on when responding to a topic "before" you go on and on with answering questions with questions. You're not mothering children or selling a house here.

I chose my side when I decided to stay here. It was not easy when we faced and were under deportation proceedures. But we stayed and this is my side. Some local people don't respect and appreciate what they've got here. They complain and whine, but are affraid to leave and try to live somewhere else. They are weak in spirit and have no hope.

There's always a way from no way. There's always a solution and breathtaking light at the end of any tunnel. This is my way, my view and my side. Is it clear to you now, Sylvan?

[Sylvan]

raoul duke who conditioned and instilled you with such blindness? I would like to know so those abusers and institutions can be bankrupted and demolished. The bailout, among true patriots, should be taken as a declaration of civil war.

[Mary3]

Another thing that's funny. . . Most of you still don't seem to have the slightest clue as to what socialism is. The bailout is not socialist. If it was, the government would see a benefit.

If the Feds actually was Socialist, they would take over the banks, fire all the jerks and take their assets to cover for the losses, and then give them a job as a street cleaner for 10 years.

[LHardy]

If the Feds actually was Socialist, they would take over the banks, fire all the jerks and take their assets to cover for the losses, and then give them a job as a street cleaner for 10 years.

That is exactly what is being proposed now in the guise of a bailout.
The Fed "WE!" are tho ones who will hold the debt and impose regulation and control over leading. That is socialist no matter what you think or say.
See definition above