4UWS, why are you so quick to prosecute the Supervisor? You really seem to have something up your *** when it comes to Wally. Did you go in front of him when he was a judge and you didn't like his ruling!
Great idea Manuel, I agree, asks the neighbors! Dan take a few minutes to talk to the people living the nightmare. Go to a few houses on either side and across the street. This isn’t BS, he did know.
4UWS, why are you so quick to prosecute the Supervisor? You really seem to have something up your *** when it comes to Wally. Did you go in front of him when he was a judge and you didn't like his ruling!
Answering for 4UWS, I would assume that he is a concerned citizen who pays taxes, and lives in the area. He is concerned by duplexes which are not owner occupied.....a slippery slope to slums, and slumlording. No doubt he is also concerned for the town because there is a management equivalence here.Originally Posted by snowwhite
In turn, maybe you are Wally, or a minion of his. Are you a town employee, maybe a secretary, wife, or daughter?
First of all, why are you answering for 4UWS? I thought he was a big boy and could talk for hinself. Maybe you are one and the same. Or maybe you are part of the tag team too.
Second of all, why don't you go to Mineral Springs and check out the neighbors yourself. Instead of doing that, you ask about going before Judge Peotrowski. What a stupid comeback. Go check it out. Too lazy?????Originally Posted by snowwhite
BTW, with the mental ability you exhibit Wally, I am glad you are no longer a judge.
Originally Posted by Manuel
I do not mean to be combative, but this appears to be more and more like grasping at straws. How reasonable is this,they are so afraid to speak to the authorities, et al, due to fear of retribution but if I walk up to them and ask they will speak to me and tell me about it?
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
Dan, I don't want to be combative either, but in effect you are calling 4UWS a lier. I hope you are not doing that. He said he did it, I take him at his word. He even said, go do it yourself. In fact, he is claiming to get his information first hand, not second, third, or fourth hand.Originally Posted by dtwarren
It is his word that he was told this, it is not his word that it in fact happened.Originally Posted by 4UWS
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
It should be noted, so that there is misunderstanding, Brian does live on Westminster, and he stated that as required. The residents choose Brian because they felt he would be best suited for the task, and he would be more at ease in front of the public.Originally Posted by Manuel
I'd rather be hated for who I am... than loved for who I'm not!
Should be NO misunderstanding. My bad!Originally Posted by Psycho1
I'd rather be hated for who I am... than loved for who I'm not!
Jeez, you think so Dan ? Just figured that out ? A reasonable person would have seen that was evident with the first post in this thread.Originally Posted by dtwarren
A remark should only hurt within it's proportion of what is true.
No it was not evident from the first post. The first post expressed only opinion without stating its factual basis. It is only after one explores what the factual basis is does it become evident.Originally Posted by Spirit of Ebenezer
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
The first post was the theme of the majority of the rest. There were very few based in fact.
Last edited by Spirit of Ebenezer; April 28th, 2008 at 06:28 PM.
A remark should only hurt within it's proportion of what is true.
You should be careful what you say when you use the official seal of West Seneca to identify yourself. Your boss might not like it.
I'll change it for you.
A remark should only hurt within it's proportion of what is true.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)