Originally Posted by
notsg
Well, I've heard nothing but good things about this appeals judge but it is interesting that this is a lawsuit alleging that favors are traded in order to get the conservative endorsement from the county Chairman. It goes before an out of town judge (ie someone who doesn't have to worry about a local chairman). This unbiased, out-of-towner makes a report that apparently is so bad for the person aligned with the Chairman that he asks an appeals judge (who by the way carried the same conservative endorsement when he ran in Erie County last year) to put a gag order on the report.
Shouldn't the appeals judge excuse himself so that no one accuses him of repaying a favor?