Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59

Thread: Clinton has 3x delegate pledges to take DC

  1. February 6th, 2008, 08:40 PM #1
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878

    Clinton has 3x delegate pledges to take DC

    District of Columbia - February 12, 2008

    Hillary Clinton's project delegate count comes out 3 times higher than Barak Obama. The same with Pennsylvania - April 22, 2008
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. February 6th, 2008, 08:42 PM #2
    WNYresident
    WNYresident is offline
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,991
    Doesn't mean she's qualified to be president.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. February 6th, 2008, 09:25 PM #3
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    Looking at all of the results, her delegate totals have all come out over the pledges, like California: pledge 42 but total was 64, like New York 127 to 166...

    even Alabama, where Obama was the projected winner, her pledge 21 and total 23, Obama's total was 21 delegates.

    New Jersey was her biggest hit so far though, pledges: 51 Total: 61

    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident
    Doesn't mean she's qualified to be president.
    While you may have the opinion that she is not qualified... the American people voting dems have something else in mind.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. February 6th, 2008, 09:41 PM #4
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    Hillary's future delegates:

    American Samoa
    February 05, 2008
    0 0% 0 4 4 0%

    Louisiana
    February 09, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    District of Columbia
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 9 9 0%

    Maryland
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 8 8 0%

    Virginia
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 6 6 0%

    Washington
    February 19, 2008
    0 0% 0 4 4 0%

    Wisconsin
    February 19, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Ohio
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Rhode Island
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%

    Texas
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 7 7 0%

    Vermont
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Pennsylvania
    April 22, 2008
    0 0% 0 6 6 0%

    Indiana
    May 06, 2008
    0 0% 0 5 5 0%

    North Carolina
    May 06, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    West Virginia
    May 13, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Kentucky
    May 20, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Oregon
    May 20, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Puerto Rico
    June 01, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%

    Virgin Islands 0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Obama's future delegates:

    American Samoa
    February 05, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    District of Columbia
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%

    Maryland
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%

    Virginia
    February 12, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%

    Washington
    February 19, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Wisconsin
    February 19, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Rhode Island
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Texas
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Vermont
    March 04, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Mississippi
    March 11, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    Pennsylvania
    April 22, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Indiana
    May 06, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    North Carolina
    May 06, 2008
    0 0% 0 2 2 0%

    Oregon
    May 20, 2008
    0 0% 0 1 1 0%

    South Dakota
    June 03, 2008
    0 0% 0 3 3 0%
    Last edited by woodstock; February 6th, 2008 at 09:50 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. February 6th, 2008, 09:46 PM #5
    bigpoppapuff
    bigpoppapuff is offline
    Unregistered bigpoppapuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    bflo ny
    Posts
    4,697
    why are you highlighting one candidate but not the other??....seems pretty rude,imho....at this stage they're both a possibility to be our next president....have some common courtesy,if you can find it...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. February 6th, 2008, 09:51 PM #6
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    I editted to change the colors so that people can see where one list ends and the other begins.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. February 6th, 2008, 09:54 PM #7
    bigpoppapuff
    bigpoppapuff is offline
    Unregistered bigpoppapuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    bflo ny
    Posts
    4,697
    Quote Originally Posted by woodstock
    I editted to change the colors so that people can see where one list ends and the other begins.


    so it's okay for you to use colors...but winfield couldn't,huh??....

    in any case...thanks...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. February 6th, 2008, 09:55 PM #8
    WNYresident
    WNYresident is offline
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,991
    I like the colors.

    Plus color is free on speakup.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. February 6th, 2008, 09:56 PM #9
    mikewrona
    mikewrona is offline
    Member mikewrona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    4,271
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident
    Doesn't mean she's qualified to be president.
    She's qualified if a majority of the voters say she's qualified, as with any candidate currently running.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. February 6th, 2008, 09:58 PM #10
    WNYresident
    WNYresident is offline
    Tony Fracasso - Admin
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, New York, United States
    Posts
    64,991
    Quote Originally Posted by mikewrona
    She's qualified if a majority of the voters say she's qualified, as with any candidate currently running.
    Not really. All it means is she's currently more popular. Nothing more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. February 6th, 2008, 10:10 PM #11
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    Quote Originally Posted by mikewrona
    She's qualified if a majority of the voters say she's qualified, as with any candidate currently running.
    Dangit!

    You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.
    I owe you one Mike, don't let me forget, kay?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. February 6th, 2008, 10:18 PM #12
    mikewrona
    mikewrona is offline
    Member mikewrona's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Amherst
    Posts
    4,271
    Quote Originally Posted by WNYresident
    Not really. All it means is she's currently more popular. Nothing more.
    Then why do you think Chris Collins is qualified. Shouldn't he only be currently more popular?

    You seem to pull out the tired popularity line when convenient to you.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. February 6th, 2008, 10:29 PM #13
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    FYI on popularity in New York by votes

    Clinton 1,003,623
    Obama 697,914
    Edwards 19,725

    On the other side...

    McCain 310,814
    Huckabee 65,648
    Giuliani 18,566
    Romney 256,805
    Paul 38,918

    Editted to add... total votes for all of the repub candidates 690,751
    Last edited by woodstock; February 6th, 2008 at 10:36 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. February 6th, 2008, 10:32 PM #14
    Enough
    Enough is offline
    Unregistered Enough's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,544
    Quote Originally Posted by woodstock
    FYI on popularity in New York by votes

    Clinton 1,003,623
    Obama 697,914

    On the other side...

    McCain 310,814
    Huckabee 65,648
    Giuliani 18,566
    Romney 256,805
    Paul 38,918
    Look at the state of our state....

    It sure does explain a lot!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. February 6th, 2008, 11:07 PM #15
    woodstock
    woodstock is offline
    TimeOut Chair
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,878
    Quote Originally Posted by Enough
    Look at the state of our state....
    Okay, let's jump to California then ...

    Clinton 2,132,166
    Edwards 170,013
    Obama 1,735,105

    on the other side...

    McCain 985,900
    Giuliani 115,778
    Huckabee 272,638
    Romney 801,568
    Paul 99,545

    This is fun... Pick another state...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The morning after Super Tuesday... Clinton comes out ahead
    By woodstock in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: February 8th, 2008, 05:44 PM
  2. Hillary Clinton - the Eve of Super Tuesday answers America's questions
    By woodstock in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: February 5th, 2008, 09:52 PM
  3. Obama wins Iowa Caucus
    By Dr Funky in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: January 11th, 2008, 07:07 PM
  4. Clinton and McCain Pull Off Upsets in NH
    By steven in forum USA Politics and Our Economy - President Joe Biden
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 9th, 2008, 06:06 PM
  5. Transportation in WNY
    By speaker in forum Polls on Western New York Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 2nd, 2006, 09:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules