Originally Posted by Manuel
...Que?
Originally Posted by erlyrizr1
The Eb and Erly show. Like Pumpkinface said, "pathetic".Originally Posted by Spirit of Ebenezer
Originally Posted by Manuel
...Que?
......"Overture, Dim the Lights,"................Originally Posted by Manuel
You know the critics initially panned Cheers and Seinfeld when they first premiered. Think I'll hang around in here for a while. How 'bout you Erly ?
I'm in. Won't skim the posts like Pumpkinhead though. Stayin right where I'm at. Hello Manuel. Welcome. But before you insult me please read the posts. All of em. If you still disagree with me as to getting answers, that's fine. But you should inform yourself first. And from what I hear, you thought the posts were pretty funny. TTFN.Originally Posted by Spirit of Ebenezer
It seems to me:Originally Posted by erlyrizr1
1. He was making an observation about something he came upon while researching something else, no doubt the Clinton St. athletic field.
2. It was not an attack, but an observation of unusial legal activity.
3. There was no call to arms on his part, no "dirty work" requested.
4. He is under no obligation to answer you or anyone else.
5. He has not lost credibility, you have for not understanding 1-4.
Manny, it's apparent that your misled, misguided, misinformed, mistaken and missing the point completely.Originally Posted by Manuel
(1-3) His observation included the names of the Reidy, Nigro, and Liberatore families, none of which waspertanent to anything. I believe that is an attack.
(4) You are correct. But all I asked for was simple answers, not only on this post but others as well, to my questions. You should do your homework and research.
(5) And, yes, he has lost credibility. Yours is beginning to fade as well with your obvious bias to your friend. Your feelings toward my credibility doesn't matter. But thank you anyways.
See, now that wasn't hard. I answered all of your concerns and mistruths and it took me all of 4 minutes. That's all I asked of Warren. Nothing more, nothing less. He couldn't, wouldn't, won't or CAN'T.
So let's recap. You hit one out of five. I refuted four of em. I look forward to your next post. It's gotta be better. Remember, do your homework before you reply.
I didn't do my homework, so I won't be able to expound on how you need to see someone about that delusion problem of yours.Originally Posted by erlyrizr1
TTFN
......looks like someone is bucking for a show of their own.Originally Posted by Manuel
It appears that the Eb and Erly show has been canceled due to Erly being placed on a short leash!Originally Posted by Manuel
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
I guess Eb couldn't keep up with all of his identities.....Originally Posted by dtwarren
Good point there Dan, and again utilizing levity at Erly's expense. Feels good, don't it ? Though it doesn't top your lawsuits and bankruptcy reference to Erly back awhile. I still get a chuckle out of that one, it was hysterical !Originally Posted by dtwarren
One of me is enough don't you think ? For some maybe one too many.Originally Posted by pumpkinhead
A remark should only hurt within it's proportion of what is true.
Get well soon Erly. Just realized who you are and why we haven't heard from you.....Originally Posted by Spirit of Ebenezer
Originally Posted by Spirit of Ebenezer
Erly is a big boy, he can dish it so he should be able to take it.
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
Another issue that needs to be addressed as part of the public discussion on reducing the size of the TB is a stricter ethics policy. At the last TB meeting Mr. Piotrowski voted on the resolution to authorize outside counsel for the TB in litigation over a legal proceeding where he has an adverse interest in. The motion passed 4-1 so no harm, no foul, however it higlights the need for this policy particularly if we reduce the board to 3 members. What if one of them is disqualifed due to a conflict? On any board a tie vote results in the motion or question not passing. This is much more likely on a board of 3.
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ― Thomas Jefferson
What was the legal proceeding you reference in this instance ?Originally Posted by dtwarren
.....Is it fair to surmise that in essence it gives more control and influence to fewer ?Originally Posted by dtwarren
A remark should only hurt within it's proportion of what is true.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)