Originally Posted by
Smartguy2523
Sounds like a campaign manager posting on the board.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say Shirley's plans are detailed - they're nice outlines, but pretty small on meat.
Much of what is in them are things being done already, and it relies a lot on grant funding. I'd like to see a candidate who says something more than "I'll do what the other guy is doing, but I'll do it better."
And, the true battle in the city of Jamestown is over the upcoming union contracts. I haven't heard Shirley say how she will get some relief for taxpayers in the negotiations, other than "empowering employees." There will be no major tax savings in Jamestown without union concessions - and the only person to actively take on the unions has been Sam Teresi. Shirley's son in law is a Jamestown cop, which makes one wonder how she'll handle that contract. And, frankly, I don't want someone who wants to be "inclusive" and empowering handling negotiations where taxpayers need a tough guy handling tough business.
Lastly, I love someone who says they'll save money by empowering department heads, because she saw waste when she was a department head. But, she didn't bring this up to anyone. What makes anyone think her plan will work when she's mayor, then?
And, since when does an election have to be polarized? Population loss is hitting the region as a whole, not Jamestown alone, which would say perhaps the economy, companies moving to other countries, better jobs in the Carolinas as reasons for the drop. Yes, taxes have increased, but what are the reasons? The bulk of the increase was to make up for a deficit early in the decade, with increases much closer to, if not less than, the cost of living since then. Do you think government costs will increases less than everyone else's?
There are issues with Sam Teresi, but the man isn't the devil.