Originally Posted by
RealityCheck
To be fair, you neglected to respond to my post as well. But I'll do my best to address your questions outlined above.
Accidental. If you'd point out what it was I'll address it.
According to the article, the position is currently being held by a person in the department with more seniority. I don't know the person's name.
I have no idea who applied for the position. I also don't know whether it is a position for which one would need to apply. From what I hear from other B&G people, Mike Meegan has a reputation for being lazy.
If that's the case then it should be addressed regardless of promotion. I'd take the charge with a grain of salt seeing as though everyone in B&G is most likely a political hire to begin with and they all know who pays the bills..
Yes, I used "Walsh Meegan," because that's who she is.
That's not who she is. She doesn't use that name, never has, but the lorigos are short, and always will be.
Funny enough, this is the "Callahan, Meegan, Walsh, and Pigeon" thread. I thought it appropriate to point that out.
Interestingly enough, I have no idea what this thread originally started out as, I'll have to look after I submit reply.
People should know that she's cut from the same cloth as Chris Walsh...a notoriously dirty politician who has had his run-ins with numerous people in town.
Again, this is the type of stuff peopl post and yet can't quite articulate or defend. just like the seniority, qualifications, application process, etc You're relying on the word of others (who may very well be correct, I wouldn't know because i was a kid back when he was in office. When I've met him he's been nothing but extremely nice, but then again, it would be strange if he wasn't)
I asked if Lorigo was at the meeting because you would think if he thought there was any possibility of receiving the appointment, he would want to be there. Ralph Lorigo has attended numerous meetings (some as an attorney representing clients and others as an observer). Joe Lorigo has also been present at a few meetings. It's my understanding that neither were present Monday.
The backstory is clear: Sheila is gearing up for her run for Supervisor. God help us all if she is successful.
Clearly you know her better than I do because I haven't heard a word about it. I also have no idea why the imaginary fairy in the sky would need to help us if she does run. Aside from these petty political accusations and squabbles from what I've read and heard she puts a lot of time and effort in to her job as councilwoman. who knows how she'd do as a Supervisor.
Oh another thing, why don't you disclose your bias to Sheila Meegan...isn't it true you're related?