Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Bee News supports censorship, sites lawsuits

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,873

    Bee News supports censorship, sites lawsuits

    Dan Meyer, Lancaster Bee Political Satirist supports censorship and sites non-existent legal suits as a reason.

    In the July 1,2010 issue he wrote:

    "Probably the best reason to end the practice of allowing anonymous comments to appear on-line is that it is just not right. Such comments simply add to the list of challenges that some newspapers - particularly daily publications - face in a constantly changing industry that is looking to stabilize itself in the still-uncertain economic climate of our country.

    He continues: " The last thing any publisher or editor wants to deal with is the threat of litigation, but for some reason, they continue allowing anonymous posters to create an atmosphere that has attorneys who specialize in defamation and character assassination lawsuits licking their chops." Partial quote from Dan Meyer.

    My opinion: First off its the person or persons who threaten law suits and the lawyers who profit from them who should be censored.

    You as a "Columnist" are caving in to imagined threats of litigation. Those who threaten such actions are usually mad because their hidden agenda or their misdeeds are exposed.

    How many actual, documented successful lawsuits have been brought against the Bee News Group? How many actual successful lawsuit were filed and won in a court of law because a person posted a comment anonymously relating to any item printed in the Lancaster Bee?

    I dare say I have never heard or read about one. The Bee is the "Official Lancaster Town Paper" so it receives a yearly check from Town Hall. The writers employed by the Bee attend events and award dinners sponsored by the controlling majority and their contributors/supporters.

    Writers from the Bee have been included in "Political" affairs involving the "Dem Committee" and their supporters.

    I believe the majority of threatened "Lawsuits" come from the same people. They insinuate they and or others could or would start a law suit. They use their influence to impress their desires to suppress certain comments and information from being made public.

    Mr.Dan Meyer of the Lancaster/Depew Bee and the Buffalo News Staff are only caving in to the "Politicians and special interest groups" that pour thousands and thousands of dollars yearly into their papers in the form of endorsements and advertising.

    Many readers of this site and many others on the net share opinions, facts and information that many "Insiders" would prefer not be written about - or publicly discussed.

    The Bee and the BufNews should make a stand for Free Speech.
    #Dems play musical chairs + patronage and nepotism = entitlement !

  2. #2
    Member nogods's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    9,330
    You are right - it sounds like an excuse to protect the guilty.

    First, under section 230 of Title 47 of the U.S. Code, websites are not liable as publishers for the content on their sites so long as they are not involved in the creation of the objectionable content.

    Second, a newspaper is only liable for content it creates if it published the content with malice, a very high bar to liability.

    Third, any lawyers "licking their chops" over anonymous posting on a Newspaper website had better go back to law school or learn to live hungry.

  3. #3
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,150
    What is odd is that the Amherst, Cheektowaga, Clarence, East Aurora, Ken-Ton, Orchard Park, and West Seneca bees allow online comment.
    The lone soldier is the Lancaster/Depew bee. It's the Lancaster political machine pressuring for censorship.

    Georgia L Schlager

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    This has absolutely nothing to do with censorship, or free speech.

    The Buffalo News is now saying that they'll require people to post by their real name. How does that impede free speech? How is that censorship?
    Back in the "old days" before the internet, letters to the Editor were always published with a name.

    I'm not sure that the News is handling this correctly - but if you've ever read the comments on their site, I think you'll agree that something had to be done.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post
    This has absolutely nothing to do with censorship, or free speech.

    The Buffalo News is now saying that they'll require people to post by their real name. How does that impede free speech? How is that censorship?
    Back in the "old days" before the internet, letters to the Editor were always published with a name.

    I'm not sure that the News is handling this correctly - but if you've ever read the comments on their site, I think you'll agree that something had to be done.
    As usual, therising, you make an excellent point. And, it looks like no one has bothered to respond. I guess their silence is just their way of saying that you're right.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,919
    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post
    As usual, therising, you make an excellent point. And, it looks like no one has bothered to respond. I guess their silence is just their way of saying that you're right.
    Only Bringthetruth can answer his own posts. Bzzzt! Fail.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,919
    Quote Originally Posted by Effigy View Post
    Only Bringthetruth can answer his own posts. Bzzzt! Fail.
    Oh and besides err, oops!

  8. #8
    Member gorja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, NY
    Posts
    13,150
    Originally posted by therising:
    This has absolutely nothing to do with censorship, or free speech.

    The Buffalo News is now saying that they'll require people to post by their real name. How does that impede free speech? How is that censorship?
    Back in the "old days" before the internet, letters to the Editor were always published with a name.

    I'm not sure that the News is handling this correctly - but if you've ever read the comments on their site, I think you'll agree that something had to be done.
    Posted by therising:
    As usual, therising, you make an excellent point. And, it looks like no one has bothered to respond. I guess their silence is just their way of saying that you're right.
    Rising, you are right. Actually, I think the Buffalo News is doing the right thing. I think the Lancaster/Depew Bee is looking for more "Letters to the Editor" in ceasing their online posting.

    Georgia L Schlager

  9. #9
    Member Riven37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Town of Cheektowaga
    Posts
    5,147

    !

    Impedes on your privacy rights under privacy laws.


    "NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT'S TO FORCE AN AMERICAN TO USE THEIR REAL NAME, IF THEY DO WE'RE LIVING IN TERNARY." BY RIVEN37
    Riven37
    _________
    All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Thomas Jefferson

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    17,449
    Quote Originally Posted by Riven37 View Post
    Impedes on your privacy rights under privacy laws.


    "NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT'S TO FORCE AN AMERICAN TO USE THEIR REAL NAME, IF THEY DO WE'RE LIVING IN TERNARY." BY RIVEN37
    First of all, you're a smarter than me, because I have no idea what TERNARY is.

    Secondly -- no one is being forced to post on the News website. Therefore, no one is being forced to use their real name.

    Finally, your whole theory of NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT'S TO FORCE AN AMERICAN TO USE THEIR REAL NAME is pure idiocy.
    You just bought a new motorcycle, right? Did you divulge your name when you registered it? If you financed it, did the bank FORCE you into divulging your name.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by therising View Post
    First of all, you're a smarter than me, because I have no idea what TERNARY is.

    Secondly -- no one is being forced to post on the News website. Therefore, no one is being forced to use their real name.

    Finally, your whole theory of NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT'S TO FORCE AN AMERICAN TO USE THEIR REAL NAME is pure idiocy.
    You just bought a new motorcycle, right? Did you divulge your name when you registered it? If you financed it, did the bank FORCE you into divulging your name.
    They couldn't possible force him to give his name when he financed and/or registered his cycle. That would be TERNARY!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Buffalo News Endorses Glascott
    By OriginalCW in forum Erie County Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 28th, 2009, 10:55 PM
  2. Reese - Amatura race in Buffalo News Today
    By wreeves in forum Village of Lancaster and Town of Lancaster Politics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: September 11th, 2009, 08:56 AM
  3. WNY Media News
    By Enough in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: September 1st, 2009, 07:39 AM
  4. Buffalo News is Tacky
    By Surfing USA in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 18th, 2009, 05:40 PM
  5. Does anyone watch anything other than the crappy news we have in the U.S.?
    By justKel in forum Morning Breakfast - Breaking News
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: February 5th, 2009, 03:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •