If it was an LGBT flag on that fence do you think we'd be here? Why are they allowed to put those flags on the (city owned) light poles along Elmwood Ave and this guy can't put a sign up ON HIS OWN PROPERTY?
Printable View
Again with the name calling. You paint the first part of your message with a very broad brush. I think there are many more people who believe in both freedom and the rule of law then those like you who believe that the law should be ignored. If you don't like the law change it but don't blame the judge for ruling with what's in front of him. The decision does not take away this man's freedom of speech and just because you say it doesn't make it so. I think its telling that you decided not to answer my question about your law background. Makes a guy wonder about your authority on the subject. He is free to put his sign in a place that is not his fence.
To be honest I think this law sucks out loud. Personally I couldn't care less if a thousand signs are posted on this guys fence. But that doesn't mean the judge should be allowed to just ignore the law. I say fix the laws, decrease them down to the ones that only protect others, and then enforce them and rule according to them. The judge ruled correctly weather we like it or not.
Plea deal - sign comes down, no fine, charges dropped
A sad day for Hamburg residents: Free speech taken away; paying a superintendent with unethical behavior to resign instead of terminating him.
http://www.wben.com/Hamburg-Anti-Saf...-Drop/19990740
Cry me a river. Take the sign down and work to get the ordinance changed. People that give the figurative "finger to the man" are no different than a brat teenager "rebelling".
Again, I don't agree with the ordinance necessarily, but in the real adult world, you need to work within the system to change it.
And another sign goes up in it's place. LOOKS GOOD :encouragement:
Attachment 4290