LHardy
July 12th, 2006, 12:34 AM
KT MacFarland
WBEN Radio 930 am
7:00pm – 8:00pm
Who is this?
A Republican woman dare take on “The Hill”?
Well it does seem that way! For today KT Mac Farland made it clear, she wants the Republican Party endorsement.
Is she worth the endorsement and does she stand a chance up against “The Hill”?
We shall see!
Who is she?
http://www.ktforsenate.com/
Endorsements to date:
http://www.ktforsenate.com/endorsements/
...Kathleen Troia "KT" McFarland, a top Pentagon official in the Reagan administration who is pursuing the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate, today announced that she has been endorsed by William Brenner, who ended his bid for the Republican nomination for Senate this morning. Wednesday, July 05, 2006
KT MacFarland has an impressive résumé; complete with Republican support.
What are her discussed platforms?
In her conversation and phone caller’s questions here is what she discussed.
On immigration, she wants to secure the borders first and very fuzzy on illegals. Her attempt to gain middle ground, I would suppose.
(As if such was possible?)
Well?
Maybe?
She does not commit to either the House or Senate versions of recent bills on immigration. KT MacFarland seems to call for combinations of both ideals.
No progressive thought here and no step forward towards a resolution.
Expect her vote to favor the Presidential amnesty program.
Come on!
I had a mini puke with this side step.
She did speak in favor of loosening restrictions on farmers to encourage fertile land development and exploitation for the better.
Could she favor an end to subsidies for agriculture?
I hope and pray for such a bill!
She does prefer renewable energy. Good!
Describing in candid detail her favor with systems such as
Wind, Water and Corn, renewable resources.
I do believe she wishes to encourage agriculture. This my fellow countrymen. Emphasis on MEN! IS a good thing for NYS!
In my opinion our farmlands are vacant and must be utilized to benefit NYS. Specifically Upper, Central and Western NY. All three of these regions contain a specific and different identitiy with individual needs.
Yet these regions could and can compliment each other to a success.
KT MacFarland did give a tip of the hat to “Ronaldus Magnus”!
Agreeing in making tax cuts permanent. Understanding the tax/eco relationships and growth through market driven forces.
Here! Here!
OK! Good! One favor in the Republican Conservative direction” She is trying.
Yet to allow NYS too contend with such revelations will be daunting!
Then she chases back to the middle ground on immigration; again quoting “Ronaldus Magnus” On the amnesty program of his tenure.
Now if this is not a swat at the Republicans; aiming towards the middle, I do not know what is?
Is this bad, nothing is recognisabile.
Is this a poor move for a republican chasing "The Hill?"
No!
For if, you intend to win NY you must gather middle grounds and the extremes must take a back seat.
Ok Fine, Yet how does this not make her a political machinist?
(please pause for deep thought and contemplation. Wait for it.....Now.)
She does wish to follow the lead of “Ronald Magnus “.
Yet what extent will she exceed to follow that lead?
I think not extensive.
Of course, this move is intended to draw in Republicans of conservative bent. Yet I do not believe this will work.
On the topic of Terrorism?
She fades and fades fast.
She believes in the recent Geneva Convention status of non-state uniformed terrorists.
Will we try those who beheaded our boys?
This is a week position and should be discouraged.
This is giving terrorists pro state status and prosecution through criminal courts. Not through a much needed Military tribunal.
War via proxy? This proposition will lead to the defeat of the US and our position in world politics.
Bad Move.
In regards to oil, she does not favor drilling.
(Again, heading back to the middle and leaning towards the left.)
KT believes in a sole proprietary promotion of alternative fuel development.
However, she does prefer that the market dictate product demand versus the government creation of a false market.
No mention of drilling our resources.
This is good. Yet a little too closed minded towards crude for my taste. We need it now while other alternatives are developed and strenghtend.
On gun control
She stated she loved to shoot and wishes for existing laws to stand and be enforced.
Final read on KT MacFarland:
KT did hint at setting up HQ in Buffalo. That remains to be seen. She did indicate, a certain asphyxiation with WNY.
I said to myself: “That is just the stench of our politics in The forgotten lands of “THE REST OF NY”!
If she would HQ here, she could possibly pull the area considering the mal-contempt that permeates the politics of NYS.
Overall; not bad but not much either.
We will see.
My input? For what it is worth? = 1 vote
Not much of a Republican yet maybe middle enough for NYS?
WBEN Radio 930 am
7:00pm – 8:00pm
Who is this?
A Republican woman dare take on “The Hill”?
Well it does seem that way! For today KT Mac Farland made it clear, she wants the Republican Party endorsement.
Is she worth the endorsement and does she stand a chance up against “The Hill”?
We shall see!
Who is she?
http://www.ktforsenate.com/
Endorsements to date:
http://www.ktforsenate.com/endorsements/
...Kathleen Troia "KT" McFarland, a top Pentagon official in the Reagan administration who is pursuing the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate, today announced that she has been endorsed by William Brenner, who ended his bid for the Republican nomination for Senate this morning. Wednesday, July 05, 2006
KT MacFarland has an impressive résumé; complete with Republican support.
What are her discussed platforms?
In her conversation and phone caller’s questions here is what she discussed.
On immigration, she wants to secure the borders first and very fuzzy on illegals. Her attempt to gain middle ground, I would suppose.
(As if such was possible?)
Well?
Maybe?
She does not commit to either the House or Senate versions of recent bills on immigration. KT MacFarland seems to call for combinations of both ideals.
No progressive thought here and no step forward towards a resolution.
Expect her vote to favor the Presidential amnesty program.
Come on!
I had a mini puke with this side step.
She did speak in favor of loosening restrictions on farmers to encourage fertile land development and exploitation for the better.
Could she favor an end to subsidies for agriculture?
I hope and pray for such a bill!
She does prefer renewable energy. Good!
Describing in candid detail her favor with systems such as
Wind, Water and Corn, renewable resources.
I do believe she wishes to encourage agriculture. This my fellow countrymen. Emphasis on MEN! IS a good thing for NYS!
In my opinion our farmlands are vacant and must be utilized to benefit NYS. Specifically Upper, Central and Western NY. All three of these regions contain a specific and different identitiy with individual needs.
Yet these regions could and can compliment each other to a success.
KT MacFarland did give a tip of the hat to “Ronaldus Magnus”!
Agreeing in making tax cuts permanent. Understanding the tax/eco relationships and growth through market driven forces.
Here! Here!
OK! Good! One favor in the Republican Conservative direction” She is trying.
Yet to allow NYS too contend with such revelations will be daunting!
Then she chases back to the middle ground on immigration; again quoting “Ronaldus Magnus” On the amnesty program of his tenure.
Now if this is not a swat at the Republicans; aiming towards the middle, I do not know what is?
Is this bad, nothing is recognisabile.
Is this a poor move for a republican chasing "The Hill?"
No!
For if, you intend to win NY you must gather middle grounds and the extremes must take a back seat.
Ok Fine, Yet how does this not make her a political machinist?
(please pause for deep thought and contemplation. Wait for it.....Now.)
She does wish to follow the lead of “Ronald Magnus “.
Yet what extent will she exceed to follow that lead?
I think not extensive.
Of course, this move is intended to draw in Republicans of conservative bent. Yet I do not believe this will work.
On the topic of Terrorism?
She fades and fades fast.
She believes in the recent Geneva Convention status of non-state uniformed terrorists.
Will we try those who beheaded our boys?
This is a week position and should be discouraged.
This is giving terrorists pro state status and prosecution through criminal courts. Not through a much needed Military tribunal.
War via proxy? This proposition will lead to the defeat of the US and our position in world politics.
Bad Move.
In regards to oil, she does not favor drilling.
(Again, heading back to the middle and leaning towards the left.)
KT believes in a sole proprietary promotion of alternative fuel development.
However, she does prefer that the market dictate product demand versus the government creation of a false market.
No mention of drilling our resources.
This is good. Yet a little too closed minded towards crude for my taste. We need it now while other alternatives are developed and strenghtend.
On gun control
She stated she loved to shoot and wishes for existing laws to stand and be enforced.
Final read on KT MacFarland:
KT did hint at setting up HQ in Buffalo. That remains to be seen. She did indicate, a certain asphyxiation with WNY.
I said to myself: “That is just the stench of our politics in The forgotten lands of “THE REST OF NY”!
If she would HQ here, she could possibly pull the area considering the mal-contempt that permeates the politics of NYS.
Overall; not bad but not much either.
We will see.
My input? For what it is worth? = 1 vote
Not much of a Republican yet maybe middle enough for NYS?