biker
January 25th, 2006, 07:50 PM
As has been pointed out repeatedly during the Alito hearings, many Republicans voted for Judge Ginsberg, even though they deeply disapproved of her politics and philosophy.
The Repubs nonetheless voted for her for two main reasons: 1)they found no fault with her judicial record on legal grounds; 2)the other party had won the last election and they abided by the tradition that it was the President's prerogative to appoint someone who shared his philosophy.
Senator Feinstein reportedly defended the straight party-line vote on Judge Alito by saying, "The times have changed. Things have become much more partisan."
One Easter, when my son was seven, he did what most seven year olds do on Easter morning. Afterwards, he walked around hunched over, holding his stomach, saying "Why'd you let me eat all that chocolate?"
He grew up.
The national Democratic Party has not.
I guess you might say they're "Stuck on Seven."
The Repubs nonetheless voted for her for two main reasons: 1)they found no fault with her judicial record on legal grounds; 2)the other party had won the last election and they abided by the tradition that it was the President's prerogative to appoint someone who shared his philosophy.
Senator Feinstein reportedly defended the straight party-line vote on Judge Alito by saying, "The times have changed. Things have become much more partisan."
One Easter, when my son was seven, he did what most seven year olds do on Easter morning. Afterwards, he walked around hunched over, holding his stomach, saying "Why'd you let me eat all that chocolate?"
He grew up.
The national Democratic Party has not.
I guess you might say they're "Stuck on Seven."