Roberts: Keep 'em barefoot and pregnant!!!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

So, anyone else out there most unhappy to learn that the guy who will be our next member of the Supreme Court wondered -- in writing no less! -- whether our homemaking females should be encouraged to get out of the kitchen and have careers?

I always suspected he was more conservative than conservatives let on -- but I didn't realize the guy is a:

A knuckle scrapper

A huge sexist.... and many other descriptions my upbringing will not allow me to utter....

[jbinbny]

:eek:

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by atotaltotalfan2001
So, anyone else out there most unhappy to learn that the guy who will be our next member of the Supreme Court wondered -- in writing no less! -- whether our homemaking females should be encouraged to get out of the kitchen and have careers?

I always suspected he was more conservative than conservatives let on -- but I didn't realize the guy is a:

A knuckle scrapper

A huge sexist.... and many other descriptions my upbringing will not allow me to utter....

Here's the story, in the Aug. 19 editions of The News:


Reagan-era documents show reluctance on women's rights, support for ID card

By DAVID ESPO
Associated Press
8/19/2005



WASHINGTON - Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. disparaged state efforts to combat discrimination against women and wondered whether "encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good," according to Reagan-era documents that were made public Thursday.

As a White House lawyer, Roberts also expressed support for a national identification card in 1983, saying that it would help counter the "real threat to our social fabric posed by uncontrolled immigration."

In words that may resurface next month at his Senate confirmation hearings, he criticized a crime-fighting proposal by Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., as "the epitome of the "throw money at the problem' approach."

Specter, then a first-term senator, is now chairman of the Judiciary Committee and will preside at Roberts' hearings.

The documents, released both in Washington and at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., completed the disclosure of more than 50,000 pages that cover Roberts' tenure as a lawyer in the White House counsel's office from 1982 to 1986.

Taken as a whole, the material released Thursday reinforced the well-established image of Roberts as a young lawyer whose views on abortion, affirmative action, school prayer and other issues were in harmony with the conservative president he served.

In one memo, Roberts reviewed a report that summarized state efforts to combat discrimination against women. "Many of the reported proposals and efforts are themselves highly objectionable," he wrote to Fred F. Fielding, Reagan's White House counsel.

As an example, he said a California program "points to passage of a law requiring the order of layoffs to reflect affirmative action programs and not merely seniority" - a position at odds with Reagan administration policy.

He referred to a "staggeringly pernicious law codifying the anti-capitalist notion of "comparable worth,' (as opposed to market value) pay scales."

Advocates of comparable worth argued that women were victims of discrimination because they were paid less than men working in jobs that the state had decided were worth the same.

In a third case, Roberts said a Florida measure "cites a (presumably unconstitutional) proposal to charge women less tuition at state schools, because they have less earning potential."

In a memo dated Sept. 26, 1983, Roberts cited the Reagan administration's objections to a proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution.

"Any amendment would . . . override the prerogatives of the states and vest the federal judiciary with broader powers in this area, two of the central objections to the ERA," he wrote.

His remark about homemakers and lawyers was in a one-page memo about the Clairol Rising Star Awards and Scholarship Program, designed to honor women who made changes in their lives after age 30 and had made contributions in their new fields.

A Reagan administration official nominated an aide who had been a teacher but then became a lawyer. Roberts signed off on the nomination, then wrote: "Some might question whether encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good, but I suppose that is for the judges to decide."

Also, Roberts struggled to define the line that Reagan and other officials should not cross in encouraging private help to the forces opposing the leftist Sandinista government of Nicaragua.

A memo dated Jan. 21, 1986, said that there was no legal problem with Reagan holding a White House briefing for two groups trying to raise funds. A month later, Roberts warned against getting too close to such groups, toning down letters of commendation drafted for Reagan's signature.

On immigration, he wrote to Fielding in October 1983 that he did not share his opposition to a national ID card.

[jbinbny]

Guess he has a lot in common with Bill Clinton.

You should support that!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by jbinbny
Guess he has a lot in common with Bill Clinton.

You should support that!

Thank you for that oh-so- intelligent response.

[jbinbny]

Truth and liberalism dont mix, do they? But it was your thread. I merely point out the hypocrisy of the article.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by jbinbny
Truth and liberalism dont mix, do they? But it was your thread. I merely point out the hypocrisy of the article.

I'm very confused.
What does Clinton's private sex life have to do with Roberts not wanting homemakers to have jobs outside the home?

Clinton has nothing to do with this issue -- except, it appears, to serve as some kind of dodge for you.

How about we have a thread that doesn't boil all issues down to Clinton's penis???

[jbinbny]

The problem with Clinton is that he thought with his penis.

And eventually it caught up with him. My only wish is that he wasn't president when he got caught.

As far as Roberts is concerned, the article is a desperation gasp to find something, anything on this man.

And they cant.

But I do enjoy watching the libs try. Ifind it very humorous.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by jbinbny
The problem with Clinton is that he thought with his penis.

And eventually it caught up with him. My only wish is that he wasn't president when he got caught.

As far as Roberts is concerned, the article is a desperation gasp to find something, anything on this man.

And they cant.

But I do enjoy watching the libs try. Ifind it very humorous.

You're amazing.

Why can't you stop thinking about Clinton's penis?

Anyway, so you're saying what was in the papers released was what -- a lie?

[therising]

Originally posted by jbinbny
Guess he has a lot in common with Bill Clinton.

You should support that!

I don't get this.

What are you referring to???

[steven]

Clinton???????
:confused:

You must be reading the wrong thread

[speaker]

Originally posted by jbinbny

My only wish is that he wasn't president when he got caught.

.

Talking about Bush again?

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by therising
I don't get this.

What are you referring to???

I guess JB isn't going to respond to your question, so I'll give it a try.

I posted a story about the Supreme Court nominee John Roberts expressing doubts about whether homemakers should be encouraged to have careers outside of the home.

For some reason, JB thought it was hypocritical for me to be unhappy with Roberts' attitude because of Bill Clinton's affairs with other women.

I never did see the connection, and JB never explained it.

[therising]

If that's the case, then it's about the most pathetic example of grasping at straws that I've ever seen.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by therising
If that's the case, then it's about the most pathetic example of grasping at straws that I've ever seen.

Maybe that's why JB never responded to your post....

[lcm]

Since when did being a MOTHER become an unsatisfying waste of time!

We are not even having enough children to replace our population in the US. All our population increase has come from immigration.

Since when does a woman have to be a lawyer to be fulfilled!

I think its absolutely ridiculous that our children are growing up alone, latch key kids, susceptable to all sorts of unsupervised behavior...while feminists chase after a 50 / 50 deal....in corporate america.

Well guess what....its not your legs and arms getting shot off in Iraq....its not your ass defending our country! So please dont pretend that women are carrying 50% of the responsibilities of this nation!

When you have sex and bring a life into this world....you should have a discussion with your spouse over how that child should be cared for....AND NO YOU CANT HAVE IT ALL! YOU MAY NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE A FAST TRACK CAREER INTO THE TOP LEVELS OF CORPORATE AND GOVERNMENT AND PROFESSIONAL AMERICA AND RAISE KIDS AT THE SAME TIME.

SHOW ME PARENTS THAT VALUE THEIR CHILDREN MORE THAN THEIR JOB....AND I WILL SHOW YOU A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR THIS COUNTRY THAN YET ANOTHER LAWYER!

[lcm]

WHINEY FEMINIST!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
WHINEY FEMINIST!

Why do all your other posts sound so rational?

By the way, listening to the Sunday morning news shows, it sounds like Roberts was joking -- as in why do we need more lawyers?

In fact, I think he married a lawyer. Poor guy. Stuck with a whiney feminist who is destroying the very fabric of our society by opting for motherhood and a career!

[lcm]

Women are perfectly welcome to have careers and be mothers

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that its not the children that are being sacrificed by two career driven parents working 40+ (45-50-55-60) hour work weeks

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that because women are 50% of the population ....50% of women should be represented in all career fields or its discrimination. As far as I can tell theres no cry of discrimination that our military isnt comprised of 50% women.

but lets not fool ourselves into believing in gender equality, the last time i men are not equal partners in reproductive rights. Men have no reproductive rights to notification of pregancy, abortion, adoption or birth even when engaging in consensual sex. The only way a father knows is if the mother wants child support.

and lets not forget that most of the whiney feminists are anti-male, lesbians, and anti-US! Their looking to use feminism to get the best deal that victimization can offer while remaining silent on the equal responsibilities that accompany the rights their demanding.

Just look for a sign saying down with the US and its going to be held by a feminist!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
Women are perfectly welcome to have careers and be mothers

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that its not the children that are being sacrificed by two career driven parents working 40+ (45-50-55-60) hour work weeks

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that because women are 50% of the population ....50% of women should be represented in all career fields or its discrimination. As far as I can tell theres no cry of discrimination that our military isnt comprised of 50% women.

but lets not fool ourselves into believing in gender equality, the last time i men are not equal partners in reproductive rights. Men have no reproductive rights to notification of pregancy, abortion, adoption or birth even when engaging in consensual sex. The only way a father knows is if the mother wants child support.

and lets not forget that most of the whiney feminists are anti-male, lesbians, and anti-US! Their looking to use feminism to get the best deal that victimization can offer while remaining silent on the equal responsibilities that accompany the rights their demanding.

Just look for a sign saying down with the US and its going to be held by a feminist!

I've decided, because I try to believe the best about people, that you are just making a little joke. Very funny.

P.S. I'm telling Roberts what you said about his wife!

[ERIEMAN]

Originally posted by lcm
Women are perfectly welcome to have careers and be mothers

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that its not the children that are being sacrificed by two career driven parents working 40+ (45-50-55-60) hour work weeks

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that because women are 50% of the population ....50% of women should be represented in all career fields or its discrimination. As far as I can tell theres no cry of discrimination that our military isnt comprised of 50% women.

but lets not fool ourselves into believing in gender equality, the last time i men are not equal partners in reproductive rights. Men have no reproductive rights to notification of pregancy, abortion, adoption or birth even when engaging in consensual sex. The only way a father knows is if the mother wants child support.

and lets not forget that most of the whiney feminists are anti-male, lesbians, and anti-US! Their looking to use feminism to get the best deal that victimization can offer while remaining silent on the equal responsibilities that accompany the rights their demanding.

Just look for a sign saying down with the US and its going to be held by a feminist!

So now lesbians are anti-US?

Can I then assume that the XXX video i watched last week was an al-Qaeda training video?

I'm probably not too far off the mark when I assume you are an evangelistic conservative, especially from your description of gambling as "immoral".

[LaNdReW]

Originally posted by lcm
Women are perfectly welcome to have careers and be mothers

but lets not fool ourselves into believing that its not the children that are being sacrificed by two career driven parents working 40+ (45-50-55-60) hour work weeks


They should be in a union. 40 hours a week, and compensation for hours worked over 40. THE WAY IT SHOULD BE!

[lcm]

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his nomination and I respect that he is an intelligent and successful man, professional, husband, father and son.

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I am proud that he is from Buffalo and is bringing the great family and regional values of WNY to the US Supreme Court.

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers opposing Indian Sovereignty

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers opposing the feminist agenda and the destruction of the family

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers supporting civil rights for african americans and gay americans

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that one of the few places that I disagree with his papers are his beliefs on the rights of privacy.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his nomination and I respect that he is an intelligent and successful man, professional, husband, father and son.

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I am proud that he is from Buffalo and is bringing the great family and regional values of WNY to the US Supreme Court.

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers opposing Indian Sovereignty

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers opposing the feminist agenda and the destruction of the family

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that I support his legal papers supporting civil rights for african americans and gay americans

Be sure to tell Mr. Roberts that one of the few places that I disagree with his papers are his beliefs on the rights of privacy.

Nah. I'm just going to tell him how you feel about his wife.

[lcm]

How about Jeanine Garafalo as an Anti-US Anti-male feminist example

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
How about Jeanine Garafalo as an Anti-US Anti-male feminist example

She sure has had a lot of boyfriends for someone who is anti-male.

[ERIEMAN]

Originally posted by lcm
How about Jeanine Garafalo as an Anti-US Anti-male feminist example

The whole "feminists are anti-US" thing is just plain stupid.

You need to respect people's opinions, even if they differ from your own.

[LaNdReW]

Originally posted by ERIEMAN
The whole "feminists are anti-US" thing is just plain stupid.

You need to respect people's opinions, even if they differ from your own.

Don't expect respect for opposing opinions from a DITTOHEAD.

[lcm]

I respect other peoples opinions....but typical of feminists....as the ultimate victims....they dont respect anyone elses.

Their to busy protecting their right to murder babies
Their to busy furthering their anti-male agenda and their war against the family
Their to busy furthering their victimhood and discrimination...while they reach for the presidency, or the CEO or the top professions....but remaining silent about their responsibilities for those privileges like serving, protecting and fighting for our country.

[ERIEMAN]

Originally posted by lcm
I respect other peoples opinions....but typical of feminists....as the ultimate victims....they dont respect anyone elses.

Their to busy protecting their right to murder babies
Their to busy furthering their anti-male agenda and their war against the family
Their to busy furthering their victimhood and discrimination...while they reach for the presidency, or the CEO or the top professions....but remaining silent about their responsibilities for those privileges like serving, protecting and fighting for our country.

This might help you: http://www.better-english.com/easier/theyre.htm

What's wrong with supporting any of those things? I support "right to murder" as you call it. Fetuses, Christians, old people - you name it! I don't see how they are anti-family. And women are VERY much discriminated against. They are highly underpaid compared to their male counterparts.

[jbinbny]

Originally posted by atotaltotalfan2001
Maybe that's why JB never responded to your post....

I said all I care to say on this subject. I'll let some other fellow conservative's take up this issue if they care to.

Last thing about John Roberts....He will be confirmed, with little or no problem.

[lcm]

Oh most definitely, he will be confirmed. I dont see any significant fights here.

And I think its a good sign for Buffalo that our local boy made it to the Supreme Court. Its something to be proud!

[Marc]

Originally posted by lcm
Oh most definitely, he will be confirmed. I dont see any significant fights here.

And I think its a good sign for Buffalo that our local boy made it to the Supreme Court. Its something to be proud!

Roberts family moved out of the area when he was in second grade. I highly doubt he considers his home to be buffalo.


So, anyone else out there most unhappy to learn that the guy who will be our next member of the Supreme Court wondered -- in writing no less! -- whether our homemaking females should be encouraged to get out of the kitchen and have careers?

I always suspected he was more conservative than conservatives let on -- but I didn't realize the guy is a:

A knuckle scrapper

A huge sexist.... and many other descriptions my upbringing will not allow me to utter....

He wrote something pretty dumb thirty years ago. I can't imagine all the dumb things people could find that I wrote in such a long period of time. It's not imortant that he wrote it then, but how he feels now.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by Marc
Roberts family moved out of the area when he was in second grade. I highly doubt he considers his home to be buffalo.



He wrote something pretty dumb thirty years ago. I can't imagine all the dumb things people could find that I wrote in such a long period of time. It's not imortant that he wrote it then, but how he feels now.

Hi. Actually, listening to the Sunday morning talk shows later, the commentators all seem to think he was making a joke.....as in why do we need more laywers.

I can accept that. I figure if he really was such a huge sexist, he wouldn't have married a lawyer!

[lcm]

Feminists have such a big mouth anyway...they pretty much dictate from the Feminist Gospel that all the evils of the world are caused by men and the US and that its all those darn children along with the institution of marriage that is holding women back from their full potential.

According to feminists....men are the stupid knuckle draggers so they should be the only ones to fight and defend this country....in case of war....women are more than capable of running our countries corporations in their absense

According to feminists, kids hold women back from being equal competitors to men...kill the kids you dont want like you would flush a toilet or dispose of your garbage....

According to feminists, men are abusers and pedophiles and incapable of raising kids let alone being around them unsupervised.

God forbid, a man should be elected to the Supreme Court who doesnt buy into the Feminist Manifesto!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
Feminists have such a big mouth anyway...they pretty much dictate from the Feminist Gospel that all the evils of the world are caused by men and the US and that its all those darn children along with the institution of marriage that is holding women back from their full potential.

According to feminists....men are the stupid knuckle draggers so they should be the only ones to fight and defend this country....in case of war....women are more than capable of running our countries corporations in their absense

According to feminists, kids hold women back from being equal competitors to men...kill the kids you dont want like you would flush a toilet or dispose of your garbage....

According to feminists, men are abusers and pedophiles and incapable of raising kids let alone being around them unsupervised.

God forbid, a man should be elected to the Supreme Court who doesnt buy into the Feminist Manifesto!

HOw is it that you sound so rational when any other topic is discussed?

[lcm]

Cause its fun to jab at what people think is sacred or politically incorrect.

You cant have a real discussion about feminism....if its politically incorrect to question the fairness and the repurcussions of 35 years of feminism!

PS. And until the democrats start questioning the power of feminism in the democratic and liberal party....they will never ever reallize that its one big MF reason why so many people have switched from democrat / liberal to republican / conservative.

Until the democrats moderate the anti-male, anti-us, pro-choice feminists....from controlling the party agenda with one litmus test after another they will never be a long term majority party again.

[lcm]

Cause its fun to jab at what people think is sacred or politically incorrect.

You cant have a real discussion about feminism....if its politically incorrect to question the fairness and the repurcussions of 35 years of feminism!

PS. And until the democrats start questioning the power of feminism in the democratic and liberal party....they will never ever reallize that its one big MF reason why so many people have switched from democrat / liberal to republican / conservative.

Until the democrats moderate the anti-male, anti-faith, anti-US, pro-choice feminists....from controlling the party agenda with one litmus test after another they will never be a long term majority party again.

[lcm]

Oh and one last thing....

People blame republicans and conservatives for their abuses and excesses alot these days (me included)

However, I blame the democrats and liberals for protecting their obsolete platform, special interests and overly dominating groups like feminists and unions....to the point where they cannot mount a successful opposition

Is the current democrat and liberal agenda so worthwhile that its worth sacrificing all the moderates, centrists and populists to the republican and conservative parties?

[therising]

lcm f/k/a modib:

Your disdain for feminists reeks of misogyny. You have a lot of fear inside you. my friend.

Feminists are not the evil people you make them out to be.

By definition, a "feminist" is simply an adocate of women's rights - no one is looking to "hold back men".

How can you have such a problem with anyone wanting equal rights??

Besides, these days the term feminist is almost old-fashioned. I'm pretty sure that there are more men like yourself that are scared of feminists than there are women who actually consider themselves to be feminists.

Settle down, moadib - life's too short to have a coronary.

[lcm]

whatever....please dont compare me

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
Cause its fun to jab at what people think is sacred or politically incorrect.

You cant have a real discussion about feminism....if its politically incorrect to question the fairness and the repurcussions of 35 years of feminism!

PS. And until the democrats start questioning the power of feminism in the democratic and liberal party....they will never ever reallize that its one big MF reason why so many people have switched from democrat / liberal to republican / conservative.

Until the democrats moderate the anti-male, anti-us, pro-choice feminists....from controlling the party agenda with one litmus test after another they will never be a long term majority party again.

I don't think you're having "fun" jabbing at feminism, or what you think feminism is. I think it scares you to death.

Why, I don't know......I hate to be so personal, but you really are starting to worry me.

[lcm]

Feminism is a sacred cow...and Im in the mood for BBQ

hahahah

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by lcm
Feminism is a sacred cow...and Im in the mood for BBQ

hahahah

Lame joke.

[Stevenco]

Why is it that so many feminists are well........not that feminine?:)

[WestSideJohn]

Probably for the same reason so many Christians are so unlike Christ.

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by Stevenco
Why is it that so many feminists are well........not that feminine?:)

Well, I guess I'll just break down in tears now and sob into my Martha Stewart linens.

All this time I thought I was feminine! I'm feeling very insecure......must bake cookies.....pies, with a dough from scratch!!!!

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by Stevenco
Why is it that so many feminists are well........not that feminine?:)

Well, I guess I'll just break down in tears now and sob into my Martha Stewart linens.

All this time I thought I was feminine! Suddenly, I'm feeling very insecure......must bake cookies.....pies, with a crust made from scratch!!!!

Yikes. My floors look so......dust-filled.

Oh, and I just realized I need to loose 15 lbs immediately, or my husband -- lured by younger woman who are also better cooks and housekeepers -- will leave me!

And then what? How shall I survive? It's food stamps for me and the kids!!!!

Oh yeah.....

I forgot I have a well paying career....

Never mind.

[Stevenco]

if you feel you must, go ahead. I wonder why you took it personally. hmmmmm. I said i wonder why so many, and you interpreted that as my saying "I wonder why all..." but if you're feeling manly now, bake the pie.

[LaNdReW]

Originally posted by WestSideJohn
Probably for the same reason so many Christians are so unlike Christ.

Can I get an AMEN?


WWJA- Who Would Jesus Assissanate?

[lcm]

Oh yeah.....
I forgot I have a well paying career....


I have no doubt that you enjoy sports....at the expense of boys because of Title IX

I have no doubt that you have a well paying career considering:
-you no doubt got your well paying career from a company that was afraid of a discrimination lawsuit because they werent adequately diversified. I have no doubt that you put in a 40 hour workweek and make the same amount of money as your male counterparts who work longer hours and travel more. Yeah, thats fair!
-all the special attention that is given to girls because they lag in math and science (while boys who are bad at reading and writing are ignored)
-all the women mentors and women's clubs encouraging women to go to college (while boys clubs are integrated and forced to include women, male mentors are subjected to scrutiny as pedophiles or abusers or denied their fathers so mothers could get sole custody, max child support, etc. Oh and lets not forget the women who serially divorce their husbands so they can move up the income scale and get the house, car, swimming pool and vacations)

You see some men may divorce for younger women....but most men actually divorce because overly manipulative controlling women who dont share or respect men as equals.

You see most women dont divorce for younger men but divorce for men who make more money and power. Its so abhorant for a man to divorce a woman for another younger woman....but hey its empowerment for a woman divorce for a better paying more powerful man right! And if a woman wants a younger man...hey thats empowerment too! Right!

Feminism is the destroyer of men, of american families and of the unborn, as well as, feminists deep seated hatred for this country and its values!

[lcm]

Oh, let me tell you about my neighbor

my neighbor whose first husband was a construction worker...and they lived in a one bedroom house that was drafty in the winter

she divorced him for a white collar guy who had a 3 bedroom house in the suburbs....

she divorced him for another white collar guy who had a 4 bedroom house, swimming pool, gave her a car, jewelry and multiple vacations every year....

I think she is going to stay married to this one unless she finds a bigger better deal than she has now.

And she is the bossiest, loudest, nosiest person I have probably ever had as a neighbor.

But hey, lets focus on mens faults....while women are such victims of discrimination. Men dont have hearts! Forget about the trail of men...that women use, control, manipulate and toss aside so they can get what they want! THATS WOMENS EMPOWERMENT!

[therising]

lcm...would you tell us the story about the nosy jew waiter again, and how he got you soooo mad???
:D

[Stevenco]

Originally posted by lcm
I have no doubt that you enjoy sports....at the expense of boys because of Title IX

I have no doubt that you have a well paying career considering:
-you no doubt got your well paying career from a company that was afraid of a discrimination lawsuit because they werent adequately diversified. I have no doubt that you put in a 40 hour workweek and make the same amount of money as your male counterparts who work longer hours and travel more. Yeah, thats fair!
-all the special attention that is given to girls because they lag in math and science (while boys who are bad at reading and writing are ignored)
-all the women mentors and women's clubs encouraging women to go to college (while boys clubs are integrated and forced to include women, male mentors are subjected to scrutiny as pedophiles or abusers or denied their fathers so mothers could get sole custody, max child support, etc. Oh and lets not forget the women who serially divorce their husbands so they can move up the income scale and get the house, car, swimming pool and vacations)

You see some men may divorce for younger women....but most men actually divorce because overly manipulative controlling women who dont share or respect men as equals.

You see most women dont divorce for younger men but divorce for men who make more money and power. Its so abhorant for a man to divorce a woman for another younger woman....but hey its empowerment for a woman divorce for a better paying more powerful man right! And if a woman wants a younger man...hey thats empowerment too! Right!

Feminism is the destroyer of men, of american families and of the unborn, as well as, feminists deep seated hatred for this country and its values!

This post deserves an encore. It just screams clarity.:)

[Stevenco]

Originally posted by therising
lcm...would you tell us the story about the nosy jew waiter again, and how he got you soooo mad???
:D

I think moadib authored that one. This woman here is just flat out rational.

[lcm]

oh please give me a break....listen to what your saying

you have no comments other than to create crazy theory to explain what you dont want to comment on.

Fine!

-when your son dies in Iraq while your daughter goes to college,
-when your daughter gets special help in math & science because women are under-represented in those fields while your son thinks he's stupid and hates school because he isnt getting the remedial help he needs in reading and writing,
-when a woman falsely accuses you of abuse so she can get sole custody, dictate the terms of your visitation and marry a wealthier husband (making you a disposable father in your own sons life) or falsely accuses you of harrassment so she doesnt have to travel for work
-when a women who works less hours, travels less and handles less complex assignment gets a raise and a promotion because the company needs to protect itself from a lawsuit....
-when your son cant get into college because of gender quotas(now that women comprise over 50% of the college population and the men going to college is steadily dropping...what will feminists say about affirmative action to admit men to college)
-when your son cant play sports because of Title IX and get a scholarship

(ive witnessed all of them...while not personally experienced all of them)

When these things happen to you or your son, perhaps thats what it will take to see just how feminism is destroying the fabric of our country. Dare I say it? Who exactly started the womens movement and the whole empowerment through victimization? Betty Freidan....what religion was Betty Freidan?

[Stevenco]

Originally posted by lcm
oh please give me a break....listen to what your saying



Who is this directed to? Address personal responses to the recipient. Example: "WNYResident, Listen to what you're saying."

[atotaltotalfan2001]

Originally posted by Stevenco
if you feel you must, go ahead. I wonder why you took it personally. hmmmmm. I said i wonder why so many, and you interpreted that as my saying "I wonder why all..." but if you're feeling manly now, bake the pie.


My mistake. I should have put a :) after that. It was a joke.
I assumed it was a joke on your part too.

[Stevenco]

of course it's a joke. what else? most of these threads are:)