View Full Version : Isn't it the Doctors/HMO's/Rx's that get all the money
buffalofamily
April 13th, 2005, 09:43 PM
Think about who gets the $$$MEDICAID$$$ money in the end. Its not the patient... it's the Healthcare system that gets the dolars...
There HAS to be a better way to get medical care for people.
Does a Doctor need to make hundreds of dollars per visit?
Do pills need to cost $5.00, $10.00 or more EACH PILL?
HMO's Making Record profits are reaping the MEDICAID money.
More people now out of work, or working for minimum wage will have to sign up for Medical assistance. Many employers don't offer health benefits.
NY needs to start reform on the side of where the money goes, as well as making sure care only goes to NY residents, and not outsiders coming in to take advantage of benefits that their own state should be helping them with.
BF
NoCtUrNaL
April 14th, 2005, 12:04 AM
The other day, I was in a doctor’s office (not as a patient or to be seen myself) and I heard a guy tell the receptionist he didn't have the 50 cents needed for the co-pay to get his script filled. It was obvious he wanted her to take pity on him and "loan" him the change.
She politely expressed her sympathy’s to his plight and then asked the woman behind him if she could help her.
The gentleman who said he couldn't come up with a whopping 50 cents to get his script filled then went outside, pulled out a pack of cigarettes from his pocket, and proceeded to consider his predicament while puffing away.
This, ladies and germs, is the problem with free medical care…people who want others to take more interest, spend more effort and money, and exercise more common sense toward their medical well being then they are willing to do for themselves.
moonshine
April 14th, 2005, 12:37 AM
This, ladies and germs, is the problem with free medical care
Yes, this is exactly the problem. The USSR and Canada are two wonderful examples and the USA is on a one-way street towards socialized meds.
Y'all baby boomers will get the medical care you need because of your lobbying power, but us 20-30 yr olds need to get the hell out of this country immediately if we are going to have a pot to piss in. Who is gonna change your diapers when your kids have to move to another country to have the same standard of living that you enjoyed? Y'all have delivered us to hell in a handbasket and now need additional taxpayer funding to guarantee your survival? It's absurd!
buffalofamily
April 14th, 2005, 07:58 AM
NoCtUrNaL witnessed: The gentleman who said he couldn't come up with a whopping 50 cents to get his script filled then went outside, pulled out a pack of cigarettes from his pocket, and proceeded to consider his predicament while puffing away.
I'm sure their are many moochers like that guy. I don't think he is an example of the majority of folks who get medical services.
The gentleman who said he couldn't come up with a whopping 50 cents to get his script filled then went outside, pulled out a pack of cigarettes from his pocket, and proceeded to consider his predicament while puffing away.
I'm Shocked!!! He's getting benefits and he's not BUMMIN' a smoke from someone else!!:D
moonSEZ: Y'all have delivered us to hell in a handbasket and now need additional taxpayer funding to guarantee your survival? It's absurd!
What is the solution?
Should the doctors, pharmacy, hospitals & HMO"s be capped so all can afford care?
bf
moonshine
April 14th, 2005, 09:08 AM
What is the solution?
There is no solution when a large segment of society demands a free handout and the government is happy to oblige at the expense of everyone else.
biker
April 14th, 2005, 09:25 AM
I was at a meeting recently, called by one of the Legislators.
A lady in the audience told a story of how she works at a hospital. She takes down patient information. More than once, she's trying to get information from someone who doesn't speak English. Then she finds they don't have a Social Security number. The lady asked, "What is this person doing in a hospital in ERie County if they can't speak English and don't have SocSec number. And to add insult to injury, this person seeking Medicaid came to the hospital in a cab."
A young lady behind me said, "So let'em take an ambulance." I turned to her and said "We don't want to pay for either." With a big fat attitude, the young lady said "Tough. You pay for one or the other. It's in the constitution."
I wondered where she came from.
Is that the way this is going to be solved? It's gonna be us against them? Those who profit from this mindless program versus those of us who pay?
OK.
Bring it on.
NCnewbie
April 22nd, 2005, 03:05 PM
I don't have a problem with the concept of Medicaid. I believe there should be a program for those in need to have basic health care. I have never used it, nor do I hope to, but I'd like to know it's there just in case if I ever need it.
However, I don't understand why Medicaid recipients get better health care than I do when I work hard and have to pay my share. I am lucky enough to have an employer that provides benefits, but I still have co-pays, a deductible, and weekly contributions. I know of enough Medicaid recipients who use the ER as their primary doctor, and never have to pay a co-pay. Why do I have to pay $50 for an ER visit?
I believe a co-pay system, even with marginal rates for the poor, would help curb some of the abuse of the system. Also, I think a limit on ER visits, unless authorized by the treating doctor that it is indeed an emergency, would also help stem the growing numbers of people in our Emergency Rooms and spiraling costs. Preventive health care is one thing, preventive health care in the middle of an ER is another!
I don't think this is asking too much of low-wage workers or welfare recipients. If it is, we should really think about the thousands of uninsured in the area (who are also mostly low-wage workers)who cannot afford medical coverage and have to pay full price for their medical needs or forgo medical care altogether.
Once again, I agree with Medicaid in principle, it just needs to be monitored for abuse and scaled back in benefits.
buffy
April 22nd, 2005, 08:41 PM
Why don't health insurers operate more like car insurers? Safe drivers get a break on their premiums so in like manner, non-smokers, people who keep their weight down etc. wouldn't pay as high premiums as the chain smoking fat ass who can't even walk but has to use a motorized cart to do their shopping. Yes I said it! I am sick of paying for the healthcare of people who should know better than to abuse their bodies. Doesn't take a scientist to figure that out.
biker
April 22nd, 2005, 09:06 PM
I think Sheldon Silver would tell you that health insurance is for sick people, period.
Night Owl
April 22nd, 2005, 10:07 PM
Bring it on.
you got it, biker. ;)
A lady in the audience told a story of how she works at a hospital. She takes down patient information. More than once, she's trying to get information from someone who doesn't speak English. Then she finds they don't have a Social Security number. The lady asked, "What is this person doing in a hospital in ERie County if they can't speak English and don't have SocSec number. And to add insult to injury, this person seeking Medicaid came to the hospital in a cab."
I am sure it isn't as often as the woman made it sound.
It may have just been one or two times in her career working in the hospital.
Another thing, medicaid tracks people by their social security number, it is one of the qualifications to be approved. No SS# no approval. The laws have changed with medicaid and it isn't as black and white some make it out to be.
A young lady behind me said, "So let'em take an ambulance." I turned to her and said "We don't want to pay for either." With a big fat attitude, the young lady said "Tough. You pay for one or the other. It's in the constitution."
I wondered where she came from.
It wasn't me biker.
Those who profit from this mindless program versus those of us who pay?
I think you are missing the point on this one. One of the misconceptions that people fall into is that people benefit from medicaid. People who have medicaid are also taxpayers and if approved according to their income, they don't get cash to use for whatever then want. The ones receiving it don't get the money at all.. it is a payment that goes directly to the doctors and for perscriptions. It's an electronic transfer from medicaid to the doctor's office/hospital/pharmacy. People receiving mediciad don't get a check in the mail for a hundred dollar doctor's visit when being sick with the flu.
Also, I think a limit on ER visits, unless authorized by the treating doctor that it is indeed an emergency, would also help stem the growing numbers of people in our Emergency Rooms and spiraling costs.
Only one flaw with this, if it is after hours and someone calls their doctor's office for a reason, they just tell you to go to the ER, whether you have medicaid or not. The ER is not always filled with people who are on medicaid, you know?
I believe a co-pay system, even with marginal rates for the poor, would help curb some of the abuse of the system.
Another misconception, it is awfull hard to 'abuse' medicaid unless there is a people getting prescriptions filled and giving/selling them to others. It's one thing to raise a red flag when some keeps coming into the dr's office for a codine perscription... but it's not something that happens all of the time.
Mediciad goes according to income and other qualifications including ss#, finger printing, proof of residence, etc. and the people getting it don't receive cash. Medicaid doesn't touch the hands of one receiving it.
However, I don't understand why Medicaid recipients get better health care than I do when I work hard and have to pay my share.
Another misconception.
Example: Two people fall and break their leg, one is on mediciad and the other Blue Cross... what would be the (improved) difference in treatment by the one receiving medicaid?
Once again, I agree with Medicaid in principle, it just needs to be monitored for abuse and scaled back in benefits.
Scale back on costly perscriptions like viagra! We shouldn't have to pay for a 'problem' such as this.
buffy
April 22nd, 2005, 11:23 PM
A lady in the audience told a story of how she works at a hospital. She takes down patient information. More than once, she's trying to get information from someone who doesn't speak English. Then she finds they don't have a Social Security number. The lady asked, "What is this person doing in a hospital in ERie County if they can't speak English and don't have SocSec number. And to add insult to injury, this person seeking Medicaid came to the hospital in a cab."
From Night Owl:
I am sure it isn't as often as the woman made it sound.
This happens everyday at ECMC. Immigrants, legal and illegal come in. A lot are referred to ECMC from Viva La Casa a non-profit refugee house nearby that provides a place to stay for refugees awaiting entry into Canada.
From Nigh Owl:
Another thing, medicaid tracks people by their social security number, it is one of the qualifications to be approved. No SS# no approval. The laws have changed with medicaid and it isn't as black and white some make it out to be
True, but not entirely Night Owl, ever hear of Emergency Medicaid? Here's a link
[URL=http://www.ncpa.org/pi/health/pd103100g.html]
Get this: Giambra has supported Viva la Casa with hundreds of thousands of our tax dollars. In addition, the refugees walk into ECMC on a regular basis, receive "Emergency Medicaid" then go on to their destinations in Canada! And if some of the services aren't covered by the emergency medicaid, guess who pays for the healthcare of refugees passing through Erie County? I know this for a fact.
Night Owl
April 22nd, 2005, 11:45 PM
I stand (somewhat) corrected.
thanks for adding the link and info, Buff lifer.
That's what's great about this site/message boards .. we can learn something from one another.
Bfloguy14207
May 5th, 2005, 06:58 PM
Just wonder if any one knows that the Ambulance Provider in the city of Buffalo has to pay a franchise fee to operate in the city. Juast like Aldeaphia cable has to pay this fee. So any one on Medicade that needs an ambulance this fee that is paid for by the taxpayed goes to the city.
captjacksparrow
May 25th, 2005, 06:10 PM
My mother is 83 yrs old, invalid living in a nursing home. She is on Medicaid. Medicaid pays the difference between the bill and her social security. She is allowed to keep $50 per month from her pension and the rest is to PAY for BC and BS health insurance.
She gets an extra $90 per month from Veterans which the nursing home cannot take from her.
She had to sell her home that she worked 2 jobs to purchase. My dad had to work 3 jobs to help pay for 2 mortgages.
Both worked from a young age to a little over retirement age. My mom had to quit school to go to work to support the family. During the war, she went to work at Curtis Wright, riveting the aft door on the small planes. My dad was in the service in the North Atlantic, chasing or being chased by Uboats.
Both paid NY taxes all their lives. When the time came to sell the home, the nursing home got the money from the sale. It lasted 6months before she had to go on Medicaid.
All the money from the bank accounts and life insurance had to go to the nursing home.
The only perk she was allowed to spend her money on is her casket and grave site.
The use of Medicaid to keep my mother healthy and maintain a somewhat good quality of life in her last years is important to me. She shouldn't recieve mediocre meds or treatment or be pushed aside because she is elderly and close to dying. She still could live another 15 years God willing. She shouldn't be denied any medical treatment because of Medicaid status.
What about the ever increasing rise of young people in nursing homes? With better medical treatments and medications, the young people will live longer lives in nursing homes. Most will eventually end up on Medicaid and drain the pockets of taxpayers. Are we to say that they have no right to live?
Where do you want to draw the line?
Stop illegal immigration is not a solution. Our country is based on immigrants and almost everyone of us has a family story to tell about someone coming across the seas to America. We are 3rd generation Americans but our ancestry started someplace else. Most were illegal immigrants running from border to border escaping the Prussians, Nazi's, or other situations. And America was the only safe territory for most to come to.
What do you expect from the baby boomers? Work years past retirement? Rent instead of buy? Stop using cell phones and stop drinking Starbucks coffee? Do you think that is what all baby boomers are doing with their money?
Do you have ,in your vision, the ultimate answer to this problem????
captjacksparrow
May 25th, 2005, 06:16 PM
Originally posted by Night Owl
Scale back on costly perscriptions like viagra! We shouldn't have to pay for a 'problem' such as this.
So you are saying Medicaid should not cover the cost of Viagra PREscriptions...why do you feel that this 'problem' should not be covered?
Don't people have the right to live a quality life, or is it because most patients are elderly and the elderly shouldn't have sex but should act elderly and sit in a rocking chair and watch Bob Barker?????
What about younger male patients that have prostrate cancer or testicular cancer? Deny them the prescription?
WNYresident
May 25th, 2005, 07:08 PM
Because frankly a lot of people don't want to pay for other peoples quality of life
captjacksparrow
May 25th, 2005, 08:08 PM
Originally posted by WNYresident
Because frankly a lot of people don't want to pay for other peoples quality of life
how sad for you...
Someday you may need Medicaid, and I sure hope the person(s) taking care of you will have a better attitude than yours and try to bring the best quality of life to those with illness, handicapps and misfortunes.
ERIEMAN
May 25th, 2005, 08:12 PM
Because frankly a lot of people don't want to pay for other peoples quality of life
Such a horrible thing to say, yet so true.
There are so many things that could be changed about the current system, its unbelieveable.
Medicaid desperately needs copays. How many times to 13 year old girls get a taxi ride to the ER because "their stomach hurts" so they can get a pregnancy test? Billed to the taxpayer: $1000 or more.
What's worse is that Medicaid often refuses to reimburse doctors for necessary treatments. This leads to deteriorated patient care because hospitals cannot afford to treat the poor!
So what good does Medicaid really do? In it's current iteration, its a huge drain on public funds. Something needs to give!
The answer is certainly not socialized healthcare. That stifles innovation and the desire to succeed. Doctors in canada make HALF of what doctors make here, and many are unwilling to continue to work in Canada because of it. Lots of docs from around here came from Canada to make what they are worth. Capping salaries will not work for the very same reason. Besides, doctors work too hard for too long of a time to be paid less. 8+ years of school, 3 years of making less than minimum wage, and then another 3 to 8 years of specialized training, making not much more than minimum wage. And to top it off, school loans totalling $180,000 or more!
Big pharma takes a brunt of the public's blams as well...I think the figure for the develoment of ONE drug is now at $1.2 billion. the most popular argument is that they spend too much money marketing drugs. I think THAT figure is at 1/50th of the total cost of deveolpment. The biggest expense is "pleasing the FDA". Clinical Trials, failures, retrys, redevelopment, MILLIONS of pages of data, etc...
We also pay 90% of the world's drug development costs. The bargains are had by other countries. People want to buy drugs from Canada because they are cheap. This should NOT be. Everyone all over the world shoudl pay the same thing for drugs, THEN we will see a decrease in the cost of them. I can say, though that Pharma is VERY guilty of repatenting new drugs that do the same thing as an old one just so they have market share. THAt should be stopped to...
Medicaid is just a poorly run system. It needs to be changed...
Sorry for the ramble...AI is on, so thats it for me!
WNYresident
May 25th, 2005, 08:16 PM
Originally posted by captjacksparrow
how sad for you...
Someday you may need Medicaid, and I sure hope the person(s) taking care of you will have a better attitude than yours and try to bring the best quality of life to those with illness, handicapps and misfortunes.
------------------
So you are saying Medicaid should not cover the cost of Viagra PREscriptions...why do you feel that this 'problem' should not be covered?
------------------
Because you can't pay for everyones problems. Viagra seems to be marketed as a recreation drug almost. AS cold as it sounds you have to sort of draw the line somewhere. Case in point when the tax payer pays for cosmetic surgery for our government employees. IT's to better thier quality of life. It's a quality of life they don't have to have at someone elses expense. There are various MEDICAL HEALTH things which one can justify but eventually you have to draw the line.
I see how cold my comment was
Because frankly a lot of people don't want to pay for other peoples quality of life
I'll explain myself better next time.
ERIEMAN
May 25th, 2005, 09:11 PM
I see how cold my comment was
no need to re-explain. you are 100% correct.
It just sounds cold. My opinion, though, is MUCH colder than yours. I dont think anyone is ENTITLED to health care. Call it extreme conservativism, call it selfish, but that's just how I feel. Darwinism.
WNYresident
May 25th, 2005, 09:36 PM
Well not entitled to better healthcare than the ones forced to pay for it.
moonshine
May 25th, 2005, 10:14 PM
I dont think anyone is ENTITLED to health care. Call it extreme conservativism
If common sense and personal responsibility is now considered "extreme conservatism" we are in worse shape than originally thought.
LaNdReW
May 25th, 2005, 10:20 PM
Originally posted by ERIEMAN
Such a horrible thing to say, yet so true.
There are so many things that could be changed about the current system, its unbelieveable.
The answer is certainly not socialized healthcare. That stifles innovation and the desire to succeed. Doctors in canada make HALF of what doctors make here, and many are unwilling to continue to work in Canada because of it. Lots of docs from around here came from Canada to make what they are worth. Capping salaries will not work for the very same reason. Besides, doctors work too hard for too long of a time to be paid less. 8+ years of school, 3 years of making less than minimum wage, and then another 3 to 8 years of specialized training, making not much more than minimum wage. And to top it off, school loans totalling $180,000 or more!
Big pharma takes a brunt of the public's blams as well...I think the figure for the develoment of ONE drug is now at $1.2 billion. the most popular argument is that they spend too much money marketing drugs. I think THAT figure is at 1/50th of the total cost of deveolpment. The biggest expense is "pleasing the FDA". Clinical Trials, failures, retrys, redevelopment, MILLIONS of pages of data, etc...
We also pay 90% of the world's drug development costs. The bargains are had by other countries. People want to buy drugs from Canada because they are cheap. This should NOT be. Everyone all over the world shoudl pay the same thing for drugs, THEN we will see a decrease in the cost of them. I can say, though that Pharma is VERY guilty of repatenting new drugs that do the same thing as an old one just so they have market share. THAt should be stopped to...
Medicaid is just a poorly run system. It needs to be changed...
Sorry for the ramble...AI is on, so thats it for me!
Pshew, thought you were going to mention the BS malpractice
insurance being too high argument..
I agree on medicaid, probably the biggest problem with the fed gov today...
THIS is what should be being worked on first, not ss.
The whole drug industry needs going over...what a scam business.
ERIEMAN
May 26th, 2005, 06:19 AM
If common sense and personal responsibility is now considered "extreme conservatism" we are in worse shape than originally thought.
What a relief! I was hoping I didn't have "extreme conservative" leanings.
I thought for sure I'd take heat for that comment....
ERIEMAN
May 26th, 2005, 06:26 AM
Pshew, thought you were going to mention the BS malpractice insurance being too high argument
That's a totally different issue that pisses me off. An example - OB/GYNs in Florida that "practice their love"...haha. At a median rate of $70,000 per year, it is driving up the cost of Chilbirth...but It certainly isn't breaking Medicaid.
ReformWNY
May 27th, 2005, 12:03 PM
Why shouldn't medicare be just as regulated as Blue Cross BLue Shield? These people get way more than I do from my plan that costs me/my employer 10K/year. Why shouldn't they be at least as regulated?
I say.. PRIVATIZE MEDICARE. LEt the Govt pay a place like BCBS and let THEM manage it. The hell with Socialized medicine... lets go the OTHER route!
ERIEMAN
May 27th, 2005, 12:58 PM
i am FULLY in agreement with that
captjacksparrow
May 28th, 2005, 08:35 PM
It blows me away to read of such cold comments. What attitudes!
Why not save time AND money and head over to ECMC and Children's and pull the plugs on all the premature/ fetal alchohol sydrome/drug induced babies that were brought into the world, since their care will only add a burden to the medicaid system and well, you know the "darwinism" thing...
The mentally challenged don't have a right to better quality of life so why not wipe them out as well.
No wait, that isn't darwinism, that is Hitlerism.
ERIEMAN
May 29th, 2005, 11:01 AM
if you want to keep wasting your hard earned money on people that take advantage of thehealthcare welfare system, go right ahead!
lyn1639
May 29th, 2005, 06:43 PM
Originally posted by captjacksparrow
My mother is 83 yrs old, invalid living in a nursing home. She is on Medicaid. Medicaid pays the difference between the bill and her social security. She is allowed to keep $50 per month from her pension and the rest is to PAY for BC and BS health insurance.
She gets an extra $90 per month from Veterans which the nursing home cannot take from her.
She had to sell her home that she worked 2 jobs to purchase. My dad had to work 3 jobs to help pay for 2 mortgages.
Both worked from a young age to a little over retirement age. My mom had to quit school to go to work to support the family. During the war, she went to work at Curtis Wright, riveting the aft door on the small planes. My dad was in the service in the North Atlantic, chasing or being chased by Uboats.
Both paid NY taxes all their lives. When the time came to sell the home, the nursing home got the money from the sale. It lasted 6months before she had to go on Medicaid.
All the money from the bank accounts and life insurance had to go to the nursing home.
The only perk she was allowed to spend her money on is her casket and grave site.
The use of Medicaid to keep my mother healthy and maintain a somewhat good quality of life in her last years is important to me. She shouldn't recieve mediocre meds or treatment or be pushed aside because she is elderly and close to dying. She still could live another 15 years God willing. She shouldn't be denied any medical treatment because of Medicaid status.
What about the ever increasing rise of young people in nursing homes? With better medical treatments and medications, the young people will live longer lives in nursing homes. Most will eventually end up on Medicaid and drain the pockets of taxpayers. Are we to say that they have no right to live?
Where do you want to draw the line?
Stop illegal immigration is not a solution. Our country is based on immigrants and almost everyone of us has a family story to tell about someone coming across the seas to America. We are 3rd generation Americans but our ancestry started someplace else. Most were illegal immigrants running from border to border escaping the Prussians, Nazi's, or other situations. And America was the only safe territory for most to come to.
What do you expect from the baby boomers? Work years past retirement? Rent instead of buy? Stop using cell phones and stop drinking Starbucks coffee? Do you think that is what all baby boomers are doing with their money?
Do you have ,in your vision, the ultimate answer to this problem????
I don't think there would be many people who would take issue with help for those who have worked hard, paid taxes, and used their own assets (instead of transferring or sheltering them) to pay their way till the high costs ate up everything. The issue is more the people who take a cab to the emergency room to get a dose of Tylenol for a headache because it costs nothing out of their pocket and a whole bottle of it at the store would cost THEM $3.99 or the sex offender whose crimes we aid and abet by paying for his Viagra.
captjacksparrow
May 30th, 2005, 10:06 PM
Originally posted by ERIEMAN
if you want to keep wasting your hard earned money on people that take advantage of thehealthcare welfare system, go right ahead!
My mother isn't taking advantage of the welfare system, neither are the handicapped, disabled or seriously ill.
The welfare system takes care of the less fortunate beings that are living and cannot work due to illnesses or diseases.
Explain how "these" people are taking advantage of the welfare system.
Handicapped children and babies will NEVER pay taxes nor put money into the system and they will recieve Medicaid and care for as long as they live.
How are they taking advantage of the system?
Let the system give them motorized wheelchairs, hospital beds, customized vehicles,ramps and anything that will make their lives as comfortable as allowed and give them quality of life.
ERIEMAN
May 31st, 2005, 06:49 AM
re: taking advantage:
i never said those people were taking advantage of the system. Its the people that get free pregnancy tests, taxi rides, drugs, etc from the system.
NCnewbie
May 31st, 2005, 09:25 AM
Can we not agree that there is at least some abuse of the system? I'm not saying everyone does, not even a majority of users, but the handful that do (and I am sure that's a small percentage) cause major unnecessary expenses.
In business, there's a rule: in a given district of stores, the underperforming 20% will constitute 80% of your problems, and if you're in charge of them, you should probably spend about 80% of your time there. To me, it's the same principle. Focus on the worst part of the system to make the whole system better for the majority of users and TAXPAYERS.
As far as the free cabride, here's my two cents. If I, a worker with health insurance, want to go to the ER and am unable to drive, I know I will have to pay the cabfare, not to mention a $50 bill just for using ER services. Now if I'm really sick, I'll pay the expense, but it's sure as hell going to make me think twice before I choose that option. If there is NO COPAY and a free cabride for this same service for Medicaid recipients, what's to make them think twice?
ERIEMAN
May 31st, 2005, 09:40 AM
Exactly. There should definitely be a copay. Same thing goes with women who go to the ER to get a pregnancy test. If there was a $5 copay, they would be more inclined to go to the drugstore.
ReformWNY
May 31st, 2005, 12:32 PM
I think we should privatize all of it.
Let a big HMO take over medicare, and run it at a profit.
We would be BEYOND better off, have compliance officers checking this stuff out, auditors,... they would be responsible to Sarbaines-Oxley standards... all KINDS of stuff.
I would much sooner have my share of taxes go into a program like THAT... then into the government hole that is tasting every bit of this failing system ,
ERIEMAN
May 31st, 2005, 12:35 PM
also, businesses should be given more incentive to provide each employee with health insurance.
Cgoodsp466
June 8th, 2005, 08:03 AM
Originally posted by captjacksparrow
It blows me away to read of such cold comments. What attitudes!
Why not save time AND money and head over to ECMC and Children's and pull the plugs on all the premature/ fetal alchohol sydrome/drug induced babies that were brought into the world, since their care will only add a burden to the medicaid system and well, you know the "darwinism" thing...
The mentally challenged don't have a right to better quality of life so why not wipe them out as well.
No wait, that isn't darwinism, that is Hitlerism.
You sound like a comunist, I bet you think rich people suck too
dont You?
Cgoodsp466
June 8th, 2005, 08:14 AM
Originally posted by captjacksparrow
My mother is 83 yrs old, invalid living in a nursing home. She is on Medicaid. Medicaid pays the difference between the bill and her social security. She is allowed to keep $50 per month from her pension and the rest is to PAY for BC and BS health insurance.
She gets an extra $90 per month from Veterans which the nursing home cannot take from her.
She had to sell her home that she worked 2 jobs to purchase. My dad had to work 3 jobs to help pay for 2 mortgages.
Both worked from a young age to a little over retirement age. My mom had to quit school to go to work to support the family. During the war, she went to work at Curtis Wright, riveting the aft door on the small planes. My dad was in the service in the North Atlantic, chasing or being chased by Uboats.
Both paid NY taxes all their lives. When the time came to sell the home, the nursing home got the money from the sale. It lasted 6months before she had to go on Medicaid.
All the money from the bank accounts and life insurance had to go to the nursing home.
The only perk she was allowed to spend her money on is her casket and grave site.
The use of Medicaid to keep my mother healthy and maintain a somewhat good quality of life in her last years is important to me. She shouldn't recieve mediocre meds or treatment or be pushed aside because she is elderly and close to dying. She still could live another 15 years God willing. She shouldn't be denied any medical treatment because of Medicaid status.
What about the ever increasing rise of young people in nursing homes? With better medical treatments and medications, the young people will live longer lives in nursing homes. Most will eventually end up on Medicaid and drain the pockets of taxpayers. Are we to say that they have no right to live?
Where do you want to draw the line?
Stop illegal immigration is not a solution. Our country is based on immigrants and almost everyone of us has a family story to tell about someone coming across the seas to America. We are 3rd generation Americans but our ancestry started someplace else. Most were illegal immigrants running from border to border escaping the Prussians, Nazi's, or other situations. And America was the only safe territory for most to come to.
What do you expect from the baby boomers? Work years past retirement? Rent instead of buy? Stop using cell phones and stop drinking Starbucks coffee? Do you think that is what all baby boomers are doing with their money?
Do you have ,in your vision, the ultimate answer to this problem????
WOW you have just reinforced all the reasons why this country
is screwed up. I agree with your thoughts on seniors,but after that you have just entered the world of Tolstoy. My taxes are to high becuase of the social programs of this communist state.I am tired of paying for it.I am 56 years old and will work till I am found dead in a Red Roof INN. Now I have to get on my cell phone and call starbucks to order my coffee,oh then I have to wash the Bentley.
LaNdReW
June 8th, 2005, 12:48 PM
Originally posted by Cgoodsp466
You sound like a comunist, I bet you think rich people suck too
dont You?
Just rich people who don't pair their fair share of taxes and bitch about the poor taking their money..
The political donor class, the rich, corporations, are the true cash draw on the economy.
Oh, and only if they call the ESTATE tax the death tax.
captjacksparrow
June 8th, 2005, 03:38 PM
Originally posted by Cgoodsp466
You sound like a comunist, I bet you think rich people suck too
dont You?
At what point did I sound like Communist?
WNY is mostly blue collar. Where the hell are the rich people around here?
Oh, the doctors, lawyers and pro sports players. Yeah, maybe I DO have a problem with rich people.
Why do you think the country is screwed up? Immigrants? We are all immigrants if you want to be politically correct.
Taxes are high in NY, higher than most states. Why do some states have less taxes and still have social programs to help the less fortunate.
There isn't a clear cut answer but putting out a blanket statement about the social programs doesn't cut it. You are not looking at the over all picture of those that need Medicaid right from day 1, thru no fault of their own.
If the needy do not get the medical help, some will become ill...the mentally ill patients would be a danger to society and most will die. This would also include the elderly, the blind, the deaf, critically ill children and babies.
Not helping them would be short of genocide.
ERIEMAN
June 8th, 2005, 03:41 PM
jealousy. pure jealousy.
So, what's your problem with "rich" people? Did some of them not put pennies into your cup as you sat with your monkey on chippewa?
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.