PDA

View Full Version : Political world of Boston



harrykllr
September 26th, 2007, 09:43 PM
How is every one doing. Concerned that I have not recieved that many replies back about my true concerns. I guess if your not bashing some one then it really is not all that important, not interesting.
Well, I just wanted to share my thoughts and my concerns about the park issue, our children's issues and so forth. We have to remember what we do now is our future and we have to voice our concerns and keep on with it until someone comes along and actually hears us. Now, being a registered Republican I can honestly say I don't care who is running under what as long as they are the right person who can get the job done. Sneakers, I haven't heard from you.

sneakers77
September 26th, 2007, 10:26 PM
How is every one doing. Concerned that I have not recieved that many replies back about my true concerns. I guess if your not bashing some one then it really is not all that important, not interesting.
Well, I just wanted to share my thoughts and my concerns about the park issue, our children's issues and so forth. We have to remember what we do now is our future and we have to voice our concerns and keep on with it until someone comes along and actually hears us. Now, being a registered Republican I can honestly say I don't care who is running under what as long as they are the right person who can get the job done. Sneakers, I haven't heard from you.

You and I can agree or disagree on issues, but at the end of the day we both want whats best for the Town of Boston. We just support different individuals. Thats how the system is set up. :o

Justbecuz
October 7th, 2007, 10:57 PM
Hey all, took a ride thur your town today to see the colors changing. It's starting, but not quite there yet. Everything looks so nice in your town, but why doesn't your town code book have anything to limit the size and ugliness of those stupid political signs. Those kinda took the beauty away...........

sneakers77
October 7th, 2007, 11:52 PM
Hey, those were DEMOCRATIC political signs, the republicans haven't put theirs up yet.

Justbecuz
October 8th, 2007, 12:08 AM
Hey, those were DEMOCRATIC political signs, the republicans haven't put theirs up yet.

If I can remember ......... whom ever Pluta, Shenk? and a Kathy _________?
Those were the names, I think

The War Is ON
October 10th, 2007, 06:53 PM
Hey, those were DEMOCRATIC political signs, the republicans haven't put theirs up yet.

More lies, Pluta and Maghran are registered Republicans. Just because their party didn't endorse them, doesn't make them Dems. The "endorsed republicans" DO NOT have the conservative nod. As far as I'm concerned the "endorsed republicans" are liberal and after talking with both of them, why would the Republican Committee ENDORSE LIBERALS. Get your views in order!!! Liberalism has NO PLACE IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!! That's why there are seperate affiliations!! STOP ACTING LIKE A CLINTON, THATS WHO YOU SOUND LIKE, SOMEONE WHO LIES TO GET INTO OFFICE!!

Iknow
October 11th, 2007, 06:40 AM
More signs allready!! Please save the signs for after the leaves fall.

I will note vote for those three just because they have polluted the town with ugly signs.

Brien Hopkins
October 11th, 2007, 08:30 AM
Cathy Maughan never even seemed an endorsement from the Republican Committee. So why did she run a primary ? As a voter I would guess that she is being led by another group. I would like to see someone who can think on their own in town board meetings.

sneakers77
October 11th, 2007, 09:35 PM
More lies, Pluta and Maghran are registered Republicans. Just because their party didn't endorse them, doesn't make them Dems. The "endorsed republicans" DO NOT have the conservative nod. As far as I'm concerned the "endorsed republicans" are liberal and after talking with both of them, why would the Republican Committee ENDORSE LIBERALS. Get your views in order!!! Liberalism has NO PLACE IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!! That's why there are seperate affiliations!! STOP ACTING LIKE A CLINTON, THATS WHO YOU SOUND LIKE, SOMEONE WHO LIES TO GET INTO OFFICE!!

If their was a liberal party line in the town Pluta, Maghran, and Shenk would have that line also! They are endorsed by the Dems, Conservatives, Independence, Working Families and what ever other lines the Eagan political machine can purchase. Don't you see, he wants complete and total control so he has to answer to no one. This democratic administration is burning through the reserves the Republican Admistration built over the years.

It's a good thing the Republicans are endorsing Mead and Piazza. At least the voters will have a choice in November,

Pluta and Maghran may be registered Republicans, but they answer to Eagan just like the other two puppets.

Maybe we shud call those two candidates Condemdence Family pawns.
They don't know what they stand for, but they have 4 lines with Eagans blessing.

TooCurious
October 12th, 2007, 01:25 PM
If their was a liberal party line in the town Pluta, Maghran, and Shenk would have that line also! They are endorsed by the Dems, Conservatives, Independence, Working Families and what ever other lines the Eagan political machine can purchase. Don't you see, he wants complete and total control so he has to answer to no one. This democratic administration is burning through the reserves the Republican Admistration built over the years.

It's a good thing the Republicans are endorsing Mead and Piazza. At least the voters will have a choice in November,
Pluta and Maghran may be registered Republicans, but they answer to Eagan just like the other two puppets.

Maybe we shud call those two candidates Condemdence Family pawns.
They don't know what they stand for, but they have 4 lines with Eagans blessing.



"Democratic administration is burning through the reserves the Repulican Admin built over the years - Republican endorsed Mead " ... WAIT - How long has Mead been a concilman? 9 years... If I understand it correctly, when monies are spent doesnt it need to go through the BOARD for approval? Isnt the BOARD made up of dems and reps? STOP placing blame. Here you go again trying to stir up trouble and start rumors. Is this what you teach your 10yr old.

Again Obviously you dont know Jim Pluta, he doesnt "answer" to anyone. Jim has a mind of his and will do what he feels is best for the town, not what Bill Eagan wants.

The War Is ON
October 12th, 2007, 08:40 PM
"Democratic administration is burning through the reserves the Repulican Admin built over the years - Republican endorsed Mead " ... WAIT - How long has Mead been a concilman? 9 years... If I understand it correctly, when monies are spent doesnt it need to go through the BOARD for approval? Isnt the BOARD made up of dems and reps? STOP placing blame. Here you go again trying to stir up trouble and start rumors. Is this what you teach your 10yr old.

Again Obviously you dont know Jim Pluta, he doesnt "answer" to anyone. Jim has a mind of his and will do what he feels is best for the town, not what Bill Eagan wants.

How many times has Mead and B. Hopkins voted NO against Eagan????? WHO'S YOUR YES PEOPLE!! THINK ABOUT IT!

sneakers77
October 12th, 2007, 10:32 PM
I think I have my facts straight on this one. Mead and Hopkins voted along with Dobson to retain Mick Lickfeld in the Parks Dept. This on the recommendation of highway supt. Telaak.

A quick meeting with eagan and Dobsons vote suddenly changes.

We know who the yes people are. Its quite obvious.

sneakers77
October 14th, 2007, 12:18 AM
I think I have my facts straight on this one. Mead and Hopkins voted along with Dobson to retain Mick Lickfeld in the Parks Dept. This on the recommendation of highway supt. Telaak.

A quick meeting with eagan and Dobsons vote suddenly changes.

We know who the yes people are. Its quite obvious.

Heres a couple of burning questions the voters shud be asking???

Does anyone know how many times Hawkins and Dobson have voted no against Eagan?

Just exactly what platform is Pluta and Maghan running on?

Why are their political signs on county right of way? Are they above the law?

Do I really want two more YES PEOPLE in town government, or someone who will stand up for me?

Justbecuz
October 14th, 2007, 12:23 AM
Where does it state you can't? ( Oh, God .... now I sound like harry) LOL

Sorry Harry............. Come on --- Smile that was funny!

sneakers77
October 14th, 2007, 12:41 AM
Where does it state you can't? ( Oh, God .... now I sound like harry) LOL

Sorry Harry............. Come on --- Smile that was funny!

Check with ECHD. Its only a phone call away.

The War Is ON
October 14th, 2007, 08:04 AM
I think I have my facts straight on this one. Mead and Hopkins voted along with Dobson to retain Mick Lickfeld in the Parks Dept. This on the recommendation of highway supt. Telaak.

A quick meeting with eagan and Dobsons vote suddenly changes.

We know who the yes people are. Its quite obvious.


Nice try. How long have Dennis and Bill been on the board together? You can only come up with one no vote. Great work!

sneakers77
October 14th, 2007, 06:23 PM
Nice try. How long have Dennis and Bill been on the board together? You can only come up with one no vote. Great work!

Check the board minutes. Its real easy. Even you could figure it out.
Go to the Jan 18 2006 board minutes and you will find Mead voted no to reinstate the patronage position of Deputy Supervisor. And guess you got that position that is costing the taxpayers an extra $1,000 a year? If I'm not mistaken, its Sherrie Pluto, Jim Plutos wife. And in case people are confused, yes, this is the same Jim Pluto that is running for councilman.

And thats a FACT, not an opinion.

Keep going, I love straightening out people just like you that have lost their way!

The War Is ON
October 15th, 2007, 05:31 AM
Check the board minutes. Its real easy. Even you could figure it out.
Go to the Jan 18 2006 board minutes and you will find Mead voted no to reinstate the patronage position of Deputy Supervisor. And guess you got that position that is costing the taxpayers an extra $1,000 a year? If I'm not mistaken, its Sherrie Pluto, Jim Plutos wife. And in case people are confused, yes, this is the same Jim Pluto that is running for councilman.

And thats a FACT, not an opinion.

Keep going, I love straightening out people just like you that have lost their way!

Mead voted no because he wanted that position and the 1,000.00 for his paycheck, also fact! That's 2 no votes, your on a roll, keep on straightening!

Iknow
October 15th, 2007, 09:07 AM
War keep reading back in the minutes, it was Eagan and Hawkins who brought the hole business of a Deputy Supervisor position back. It used to be a board member that would act as deputy supervisions but since Eagan and your friend Hawkins(another Patchin Fireman and works for Paluto) got together and decided poor Sherry needed a job. Patronage to the Maximum.
Please explain that one War.

sneakers77
October 15th, 2007, 09:14 PM
Mead voted no because he wanted that position and the 1,000.00 for his paycheck, also fact! That's 2 no votes, your on a roll, keep on straightening!

You're not reading the minutes and that was your home-work assignment.
Mr. Mead wanted a board member to be appointed to that position with no pay, SAVING the taxpayers $1,000/yr.

Now do your homework, and tell me how many times the yes people
(hawkins and dobson) have voted no against Mr. Eagan.

It would seem to me some of your facts are lies. That doesn't give you much credibility, does it? :confused:

The War Is ON
October 16th, 2007, 06:14 PM
You're not reading the minutes and that was your home-work assignment.
Mr. Mead wanted a board member to be appointed to that position with no pay, SAVING the taxpayers $1,000/yr.

Now do your homework, and tell me how many times the yes people
(hawkins and dobson) have voted no against Mr. Eagan.

It would seem to me some of your facts are lies. That doesn't give you much credibility, does it? :confused:


I've never stated fact about no votes, just asked questions, and your stuck at 2 ! Are you done with your homework? By the way, I don't care to much about Dobson and Hawkins; I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THEM. YOU SEEM TO BE VERY CONFUSED!!

sneakers77
October 16th, 2007, 09:28 PM
I've never stated fact about no votes, just asked questions, and your stuck at 2 ! Are you done with your homework? By the way, I don't care to much about Dobson and Hawkins; I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THEM. YOU SEEM TO BE VERY CONFUSED!!

You need to put on your glasses and re-read post #18.
And while you're at it, why not answer post #19

Report due