View Full Version : Political hatchet man hired for Hamburg Town Board Campaign
FJB
May 21st, 2007, 09:42 PM
I have learned tonight that Jim Sorrentino has hired Larry Adamczyk to run the Democratic campaigns for the Town Board. People close to the campaign have confirmed that Larry is being paid $5,000 per month for his services. Larry is widely known for his forte of smearing candidates and it is expected that this is exactly why he was hired. Read all about it at http://hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com/?p=130
My2cents
May 21st, 2007, 10:31 PM
I have faith the board will continue on the path of self destruction and make his efforts futile.
scooter1251
May 21st, 2007, 11:07 PM
Well Ford didyou not try to smear the Frontier School Board election Comerford,Figiel and Lalka.You tried to make Mr.Schreckengost look like the only one to vote for and slander the other three.People go check out the Frontier posts and see Mr.beckwith is playing the same game that this other guy he claims will play.
FJB
May 21st, 2007, 11:10 PM
Well Ford didyou not try to smear the Frontier School Board election Comerford,Figiel and Lalka.You tried to make Mr.Schreckengost look like the only one to vote for and slander the other three.People go check out the Frontier posts and see Mr.beckwith is playing the same game that this other guy he claims will play.
I have no candidate to promote in this race. I am just reporting the situation as it comes in to me. Larry has a long history of political slander, I expect this campaign to get very interesting, very fast.
scooter1251
May 21st, 2007, 11:15 PM
Why say anything then if you can do it why not Larry no big deal then.
FJB
May 21st, 2007, 11:16 PM
Why say anything then if you can do it why not Larry no big deal then.
I don't remember saying it was a big deal. I was just reporting the facts as I know them and keeping the public informed.
FJB
May 21st, 2007, 11:18 PM
My opinion is that it shows that Jim Sorrentino is terrified of the quality of the candidtes the opposition is putting up for the race.
scooter1251
May 21st, 2007, 11:20 PM
Just the same you laying on this poor guy Larry like you did in Frontier but it did not work there.
FJB
May 21st, 2007, 11:27 PM
Just the same you laying on this poor guy Larry like you did in Frontier but it did not work there.
There is a huge difference between Larry and Lalka. Larry has been smearing people for tens of years and Lalka is just .....well....Lalka.
Larry is professional gun hired to disparage a candidate who has served the community for 40 years. I am told that Larry already has his plan of attack ready and if what I am told is true then he is going where even I wouldn't dare to go. I can be a mean SOB but I don't attack peoples families who aren't involved in politics. I'm told that that is the first thing Larry is going to do. I hope I've been told wrong and been given bad information about this.
scooter1251
May 21st, 2007, 11:39 PM
I'am not talking about Lalka i said all 3 you tried to talk bad about just to get Mr.Schreckengost votes but like I said it did not work out for you.But i do agree with you on leaveing spouses and children out of it.
My2cents
May 22nd, 2007, 12:04 AM
There is a huge difference between Larry and Lalka. Larry has been smearing people for tens of years and Lalka is just .....well....Lalka.
Larry is professional gun hired to disparage a candidate who has served the community for 40 years. I am told that Larry already has his plan of attack ready and if what I am told is true then he is going where even I wouldn't dare to go. I can be a mean SOB but I don't attack peoples families who aren't involved in politics. I'm told that that is the first thing Larry is going to do. I hope I've been told wrong and been given bad information about this.
If he indeed takes this route I believe the voters will be disgusted at the tactics and see through them as a desperate move by a desperate board. Is that what this is going to come down to. Lets all be men and fight fair. Candidate against candidate. If this is how it will be played the citizens of Hamburg will suffer the most.
WNYresident
May 22nd, 2007, 12:37 AM
Larry is widely known for his forte of smearing candidates and it is expected that this is exactly why he was hired.
Does Larry know about karma? Karma always bites you in the butt... :)
As soon as you hear some "smear" created by another candidate on either side post it up so we can develope a pattern from which groups this type of campaigning comes from.
j.camareri
May 22nd, 2007, 07:54 AM
I have learned tonight that Jim Sorrentino has hired Larry Adamczyk to run the Democratic campaigns for the Town Board. People close to the campaign have confirmed that Larry is being paid $5,000 per month for his services. Larry is widely known for his forte of smearing candidates and it is expected that this is exactly why he was hired. Read all about it at http://hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com/?p=130
wow. mr. "born again christian" sorrentino does something else to solidify his place on a hot coal in the hereafter. has anyone ever heard of a more crooked and hypocritical person?
i love it tho. give the lot of them enough rope, cuz they're hangin' themselves! whatever they try to do to tom best--the public will see right thru it. the public was angry enough over the deputy post those geniuses got rid of. wait until the uproar they cause by personally attacking him. this is sorrentino's last election because he is irrelevant.
FJB
May 22nd, 2007, 12:17 PM
I just recieved this private message from a freind on this message board. Apparently anyone who wishes to google Larry Adamczky can find this info. I think it's very interesting and I thought I would share it with you.
FJB:
A simple google search on this Larry fellow produced an interesting result. I'll paste some of the information.
The site is: www.qrd.org/qrd/usa/legal/lgln/1998/04.98
Scroll down toward the bottom to find this:
Federal Court Rules Against HIV+ Campaign Official in HIV
Disclosure Lawsuit
Federal District Judge John T. Elfvin allowed the City of Buffalo
to amend its response to a 1995 HIV disclosure lawsuit after a 22
month lag. _Adamczyk v. City of Buffalo_, 1998 WL 89342 (W.D.N.Y.,
Feb. 23). Judge Elfvin also granted summary judgement for the City
regarding most of the suit. Also named in the suit were the
Buffalo Police Department, the Erie County Democratic Party, and
various John and Jane Does.
On September 15, 1992, Laurence A. Adamczyk was arrested for DWI
and obstructing governmental administration. He was asked if he
was taking any medication. Adamczyk said that he was taking AZT
because he was HIV+. Adamczyk's HIV status was noted on an
unspecified form that was required to be completed for all incoming
arrestees. Adamczyk, along with the unspecified form, were taken
to the cellblock area. One of the officers noted on a prisoner
control sheet: "A-4: Adamczyk, Lawrence --taking AZT for HIV."
The police had, at the time, a policy of recording all medical
information, including HIV-related information, on prisoner control
sheets. The Police Department sent a copy of the form to the Clerk
of the Buffalo City Court and the Erie County Probation Department.
Adamczyk was released on September 22nd.
Three years later, while Adamczyk was Erie County Executive
candidate Dennis Gorski's campaign manager, an anonymous fax was
sent to media outlets on September 7, 1995. It read in part:
"DEAR VOTER, ... ONE CONCRETE FACT WE ALL MUST KNOW IS THAT
GORSKI'S CAMPAIGN MANAGER, LARRY ADAMCZYK[,] IS INFECTED WITH AIDS
AND IS HIV+. ALL VOTERS SHOULD KNOW THE PEOPLE AROUND GORSKI ARE
NOT NORMAL PEOPLE... (ADAMCZYK['S] LAST ARREST AND CELLBLOCK SHEET
ARE ATTACHED FOR PROOF)."
I don't know anything about this guy, but I'd find it interesting that the Dems would really use him to attack Tom Best. What do you think? Food for thought.
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 12:25 PM
I just recieved this private message from a freind on this message board. Apparently anyone who wishes to google Larry Adamczky can find this info. I think it's very interesting and I thought I would share it with you.
FJB:
A simple google search on this Larry fellow produced an interesting result. I'll paste some of the information.
The site is: www.qrd.org/qrd/usa/legal/lgln/1998/04.98
Scroll down toward the bottom to find this:
Federal Court Rules Against HIV+ Campaign Official in HIV
Disclosure Lawsuit
Federal District Judge John T. Elfvin allowed the City of Buffalo
to amend its response to a 1995 HIV disclosure lawsuit after a 22
month lag. _Adamczyk v. City of Buffalo_, 1998 WL 89342 (W.D.N.Y.,
Feb. 23). Judge Elfvin also granted summary judgement for the City
regarding most of the suit. Also named in the suit were the
Buffalo Police Department, the Erie County Democratic Party, and
various John and Jane Does.
On September 15, 1992, Laurence A. Adamczyk was arrested for DWI
and obstructing governmental administration. He was asked if he
was taking any medication. Adamczyk said that he was taking AZT
because he was HIV+. Adamczyk's HIV status was noted on an
unspecified form that was required to be completed for all incoming
arrestees. Adamczyk, along with the unspecified form, were taken
to the cellblock area. One of the officers noted on a prisoner
control sheet: "A-4: Adamczyk, Lawrence --taking AZT for HIV."
The police had, at the time, a policy of recording all medical
information, including HIV-related information, on prisoner control
sheets. The Police Department sent a copy of the form to the Clerk
of the Buffalo City Court and the Erie County Probation Department.
Adamczyk was released on September 22nd.
Three years later, while Adamczyk was Erie County Executive
candidate Dennis Gorski's campaign manager, an anonymous fax was
sent to media outlets on September 7, 1995. It read in part:
"DEAR VOTER, ... ONE CONCRETE FACT WE ALL MUST KNOW IS THAT
GORSKI'S CAMPAIGN MANAGER, LARRY ADAMCZYK[,] IS INFECTED WITH AIDS
AND IS HIV+. ALL VOTERS SHOULD KNOW THE PEOPLE AROUND GORSKI ARE
NOT NORMAL PEOPLE... (ADAMCZYK['S] LAST ARREST AND CELLBLOCK SHEET
ARE ATTACHED FOR PROOF)."
I don't know anything about this guy, but I'd find it interesting that the Dems would really use him to attack Tom Best. What do you think? Food for thought.
Talk about a smear campaign!
j.camareri
May 22nd, 2007, 12:48 PM
Talk about a smear campaign!
FJB didn't write that. It apparently came from that web site, so any smear should be blamed on the author of the web site wouldn't you say?
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 12:54 PM
FJB didn't write that. It apparently came from that web site, so any smear should be blamed on the author of the web site wouldn't you say?
No. FJB said that Adamczyk was coming into Hamburg to run a smear campaign and then FJB starts bringing up this guys personal stuff. Who cares if he has AIDS? How is that relevant to his thread? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.
j.camareri
May 22nd, 2007, 01:01 PM
No. FJB said that Adamczyk was coming into Hamburg to run a smear campaign and then FJB starts bringing up this guys personal stuff. Who cares if he has AIDS? How is that relevant to his thread? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.
actually its kinda funny. i mean, it isn't pot calling the kettle black. it's that people would actually hire someone with his own baggage to bring to the public someone else's. I find it a bit ironic.
who knows tho. this may all just be empty chatter to get people buzzing.
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 01:13 PM
actually its kinda funny. i mean, it isn't pot calling the kettle black. it's that people would actually hire someone with his own baggage to bring to the public someone else's. I find it a bit ironic.
who knows tho. this may all just be empty chatter to get people buzzing.
That's my point. FJB is saying this guy is going to smear people. But to date, he hasn't. Then FJB passes along info from someone else that smears this guy. This whole thread is based on unproven speculation that was spread by word of mouth.
And just because the Hamburg Dem Committee hires this guy, doesnt mean the Dem candidates have to use whatever he can dig up on their opponents.
j.camareri
May 22nd, 2007, 01:16 PM
And just because the Hamburg Dem Committee hires this guy, doesnt mean the Dem candidates have to use whatever he can dig up on their opponents.
You must not know much about Sorrentino.
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 01:21 PM
And just because the Hamburg Dem Committee hires this guy, doesnt mean the Dem candidates have to use whatever he can dig up on their opponents.
You must not know much about Sorrentino.[/QUOTE]
I dont personally know him. But I know his type. There are many times candidates are presented with options. Do we attack them on a tangible issue to the campaign or do we go after him for something personal? Or the other option is to take the high road and keep the campaign civil by just discussing the issues. You saw it in Hamburg 3 years ago in the Assembly race.
Fran Pordum attacked Pat Hoaks health (diabetes, i think) and Pordum won the Dem primary. But when it came to the General Election, Jack Quinn III beat both Pordum and Hoak. Not once did I hear or see anything negative come from the Quinn campaign and I am sure he could have brought out personal things about both Pordum and Hoak.
Maybe this years candidates will take the high road. I highly doubt it because negative campaigning has become acceptable. But one can hope!
My2cents
May 22nd, 2007, 01:23 PM
After Walters campaign, the Dems felt he ran a "dirty" campaign. Now they are going to use anything to try to retain their seats. They will use their view of that past campaign as justification. But if you remember, Walters never personally attacked anyone outside their job performance. We need to make sure that this campaign stays within these limits.
FJB
May 22nd, 2007, 02:40 PM
I just received two independent media confirmations that all this is true about Larry Adamczyk.
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 02:43 PM
I just received two independent media confirmations that all this is true about Larry Adamczyk.
How is Adamczyks past transgressions relevant to his hiring? He isnt running for office. He hasnt said a word about the Hamburg races yet. I think you are pulling the cart before the horse. I think that you should investigate this should he start pulling personal punches. To date, he has not.
His DWI and the fact he has AIDS has been known for many many years. I never doubted the credibility of the report. I just dont understand the point of you posting it at this point.
scooter1251
May 22nd, 2007, 02:52 PM
Look at the threads from yesterday. Mr.Beckwith also tried to smear the Frontier School Board race and ,I said he'll do it here and there he is doing it he could of waited for Larry to do something first but he coulden't.Boy did i call that one on the button.
FJB
May 22nd, 2007, 03:12 PM
Does Larry know about karma? Karma always bites you in the butt... :)
I think Carma already bit Larry in the butt. So did Mikey, Joey, Stevey, and every other guy he probably met in those alternative bars I think are around Buffalo. :D
crabapples
May 22nd, 2007, 03:18 PM
I think Carma already bit Larry in the butt. So did Mikey, Joey, Stevey, and every other guy he probably met in those alternative bars I think are around Buffalo. :D
Did you edit your original post or was it removed? That was quite possibly the worse display of respect for a person I have seen on this forum. To think that you ran for County Legislature and some people may have voted for you. You are a homophobe. What little respect I had for you was thrown out the window when you posted those remarks.
Maybe you are just jealous that Larry has turned you down in the past at the alternative bars that you reference?
FJB
May 22nd, 2007, 03:20 PM
Did you edit your original post or was it removed? That was quite possibly the worse display of respect for a person I have seen on this forum. To think that you ran for County Legislature and some people may have voted for you. You are a homophobe. What little respect I had for you was thrown out the window when you posted those remarks.
Maybe you are just jealous that Larry has turned you down in the past at the alternative bars that you reference?
It was removed! Res gets on his high horse every once in a while. It would be different if he was consistent but I guess today he is on the rag. I did like the comment about custard doughnuts though! LOL!
FJB
May 22nd, 2007, 03:22 PM
Who knows, maybe Sorrentino brang him in for a little extra curricular activity after work. Think he is coming out of the closet?
My2cents
May 22nd, 2007, 04:04 PM
Do people resort to bigoted remarks because they are lazy and can't offer up relevant information to use against someone? We all know that this summers town race will be a vigorously mean spirited one. There are more than enough issues to hammer the town board with. It would be a real shame if people begin to use personal and derogatory attacks that are totally irrelevant to their suitability (or unsuitability) to lead this town government out of the depths it has sunk to. Lets not start this behavior on these threads.
scooter1251
May 22nd, 2007, 04:43 PM
I said yesterday Ford would start the ball rolling.Even though he did not type it but why put it up keep it to yourslef.Ford could not keep it to himslef now it looks like a smear campaign. THANKS ALOT FORD YOU DID IT AGAIN
bwilson
May 22nd, 2007, 05:27 PM
I have sent e-mails to Sorrentino requesting the resumes of his candidates for HF. He hasn't responded. I am willing to post their resumes and any letters his candidates want to submit. I will not edit them. Would you please get the word to Jim Sorrentino for me and find out if he wants the exposure for his candidates.
So FJB attacks character insinuates homosexuality/saxual harrassment and then expects to get cooperation? To all you IP members out there please note this is guy is a sick individual. do you really want him involved in your party...AT ALL?
FJB....KNOCK IT OFF! even your allies on this site are turning on you
bwilson
May 22nd, 2007, 05:30 PM
But on the other hand lets look at the double standard. We can take the Hamburg Beach as the example here. How many of you men out there go to the beach? When you are laying out don't you take your shirts off and get some sun? But now a woman does the same thing, only she gets arrested for indecent exposure.
That's not illegal...women can and do go topless at the beach.
My2cents
May 22nd, 2007, 06:26 PM
QUOTE]
That's not illegal...women can and do go topless at the beach.
Try it. You will be arrested
WNYresident
May 22nd, 2007, 06:44 PM
Did you edit your original post or was it removed? That was quite possibly the worse display of respect for a person I have seen on this forum. To think that you ran for County Legislature and some people may have voted for you. You are a homophobe. What little respect I had for you was thrown out the window when you posted those remarks.
Maybe you are just jealous that Larry has turned you down in the past at the alternative bars that you reference?
IT was removed because it was a very ignorant post.
scooter1251
May 22nd, 2007, 07:32 PM
Glad too see Beckwith gone for a couple of days that scum sucking low life geek I see he is crying on the Hamburg First site now.
WNYresident
May 22nd, 2007, 10:21 PM
http://hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com/
Most of you read his comments he made.
Do you believe I was wrong putting them into the "posts to review" forum?
scooter1251
May 22nd, 2007, 11:02 PM
yOU ARE RIGHT FORD IS A LOW LIFE AND LIKE TO SLANDER AND START CRAP KEEP HIM OFF THIS SITE FOR LIFE HE'S NO ROTTEN GOOD................
Bubba
May 22nd, 2007, 11:35 PM
Ford is my brother and although I think he gets a little out of hand at times, I think he has a right to his opinion. If he offends and uses bad language then he gets what he gets, but to ban him because he presents a point of view that sparks a lot of emotion is just wrong. He quotes the phrase McCarthyism on his site and McCarthy used fear and censorship to intimidate writers all over this country to stop discussing issues considered outrageous and liberal at the time. Is that the underlying reason that he was banned? If it was then you are wrong in what you did. I don't know who this Tony guy is but maybe it's him who is wrong here.
WNYresident
May 23rd, 2007, 12:01 AM
Ford is my brother and although I think he gets a little out of hand at times, I think he has a right to his opinion. If he offends and uses bad language then he gets what he gets, but to ban him because he presents a point of view that sparks a lot of emotion is just wrong. He quotes the phrase McCarthyism on his site and McCarthy used fear and censorship to intimidate writers all over this country to stop discussing issues considered outrageous and liberal at the time. Is that the underlying reason that he was banned? If it was then you are wrong in what you did. I don't know who this Tony guy is but maybe it's him who is wrong here.
He was banned for making a mean and ignorant comment about someone. It's not like he said so and so happens to be gay. No, he said it in a very ignorant way to make someone sound like a bad person. Same exact thing he accused another political party of doing.
And then get this.
He goes and makes a comment on his blog which I let him host which I really don't mind (anyone wants one just ask) yet he takes a shot at me for censorship.
Here's a funny. I posted a comment on his blog somethig like "I removed the post because it was ignorant" . He removed it after it was posted. Isn't that censorship hypocrisy :)
A what does Bob McCarthy from the news have to do with the freedom of speech?
Censorship in WNY on Speakup WNY Forums (http://hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com/?p=132)
<SMALL>May 22nd, 2007 <!-- by admin --></SMALL>
I have been banned from SpeakupWNY for 2 days for telling the truth on several hot bed issues. As a result I will be looking for and eventually moving this site to my own user domain. As soon as I figure out which web master I will be using I will let you all know.
Censorship is alive and well in the USA and Tony Fracasso owner of SUWNY is apparently a believer in McCarthyism tactics designed to stop your freedom of speech.
Bubba
May 23rd, 2007, 03:45 PM
I have read the posts that are here to read. I didn't see what he wrote that was taken off the site but from what I can tell Ford seems to be right. Like it or not censorship is evil and it looks as if it showed its ugly head on this message board. Anyway Ford defines McCarthyism as the following on Hamburg First.
Joseph Raymond McCarthy (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a Republican U.S. Senator from the state of Wisconsin between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public face of a period of extreme Anti-communist suspicion inspired by the tensions of the cold war. He was noted for making unsubstantiated claims that there were large numbers of communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. Ultimately, his tactics led to his being discredited and censured by the United States Senate. The term “McCarthyism,” coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy’s practices, was soon applied to similar anti-communist pursuits. Today the term is used more generally to describe demagogic, reckless, and unsubstantiated accusations, as well as public attacks on authors, writers and any media who would criticize free speech.
crabapples
May 23rd, 2007, 04:05 PM
I have read the posts that are here to read. I didn't see what he wrote that was taken off the site but from what I can tell Ford seems to be right. Like it or not censorship is evil and it looks as if it showed its ugly head on this message board. Anyway Ford defines McCarthyism as the following on Hamburg First.
Joseph Raymond McCarthy (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a Republican U.S. Senator from the state of Wisconsin between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public face of a period of extreme Anti-communist suspicion inspired by the tensions of the cold war. He was noted for making unsubstantiated claims that there were large numbers of communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. Ultimately, his tactics led to his being discredited and censured by the United States Senate. The term “McCarthyism,” coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy’s practices, was soon applied to similar anti-communist pursuits. Today the term is used more generally to describe demagogic, reckless, and unsubstantiated accusations, as well as public attacks on authors, writers and any media who would criticize free speech.
Trust me, what your brother posted was despicable. He should be, but wont be, ashamed of what he wrote. Ask him at your next family gathering what he wrote.
therising
May 23rd, 2007, 04:59 PM
I have read the posts that are here to read. I didn't see what he wrote that was taken off the site but from what I can tell Ford seems to be right. Like it or not censorship is evil and it looks as if it showed its ugly head on this message board. Anyway Ford defines McCarthyism as the following on Hamburg First.
Would YOU have an issue if I posted something that referred to you having male ejaculate running down your chin?
'Cause that's the type of thing your bro finds acceptable.
yokes
May 23rd, 2007, 05:03 PM
Ford is my brother and although I think he gets a little out of hand at times, I think he has a right to his opinion. If he offends and uses bad language then he gets what he gets, but to ban him because he presents a point of view that sparks a lot of emotion is just wrong. He quotes the phrase McCarthyism on his site and McCarthy used fear and censorship to intimidate writers all over this country to stop discussing issues considered outrageous and liberal at the time. Is that the underlying reason that he was banned? If it was then you are wrong in what you did. I don't know who this Tony guy is but maybe it's him who is wrong here.
He wasnt banned because his opinion was controversial.
He was banned because the language he chose to use on a public message board.
Bubba
May 23rd, 2007, 05:45 PM
Would YOU have an issue if I posted something that referred to you having male ejaculate running down your chin?
'Cause that's the type of thing your bro finds acceptable.
I just called by brother to ask him about this comment and he said that his comment was about cream and custard doughnuts. He said he never said anything about ejaculate. I think you all made an assumption and now are pointing the finger at Ford. But by the way, why can you say ejaculate on someones face and not get banned but he said doughnuts and did. A bit of a double standard I think. I also think all of you on this site are a bit off your rocker with little else to do. You should have bigger things to worry about if you ask me.
Ragin
May 23rd, 2007, 05:53 PM
He wasnt banned because his opinion was controversial.
He was banned because the language he chose to use on a public message board.
yea .. his post was pretty gross.
He could have simply said "he's gay" and left it at that.
We're pretty smart, we know that means.
A description wasn't necessary http://www.barbandgreg.com/images/Emoticons/cower.gif
Ragin
May 23rd, 2007, 06:01 PM
I just called by brother to ask him about this comment and he said that his comment was about cream and custard doughnuts. He said he never said anything about ejaculate. I think you all made an assumption and now are pointing the finger at Ford. But by the way, why can you say ejaculate on someones face and not get banned but he said doughnuts and did. A bit of a double standard I think. I also think all of you on this site are a bit off your rocker with little else to do. You should have bigger things to worry about if you ask me.
umm .. he told us what assumptions to make.
Ford is no stranger to this mb. He's been a member long enough to know what is considered inappropriate.
yokes
May 23rd, 2007, 06:06 PM
I just called by brother to ask him about this comment and he said that his comment was about cream and custard doughnuts. He said he never said anything about ejaculate. I think you all made an assumption and now are pointing the finger at Ford. But by the way, why can you say ejaculate on someones face and not get banned but he said doughnuts and did. A bit of a double standard I think. I also think all of you on this site are a bit off your rocker with little else to do. You should have bigger things to worry about if you ask me.
sorry to say he has either forgot what he posted or is mis-informing you.
WNYresident
May 23rd, 2007, 06:42 PM
I just called by brother to ask him about this comment and he said that his comment was about cream and custard doughnuts. He said he never said anything about ejaculate. I think you all made an assumption and now are pointing the finger at Ford. But by the way, why can you say ejaculate on someones face and not get banned but he said doughnuts and did. A bit of a double standard I think. I also think all of you on this site are a bit off your rocker with little else to do. You should have bigger things to worry about if you ask me.
Why would you call him when you two are using the same computer to post on the messageboard? Wouldn't it just be easier to turn around and ask him if you are indeed his brother and not ford posting under another name?
We DO not track IPs but we do track multiple screen names which use the same computer. We don't need any sybil multi-personality types confusing people.
Bubba
May 23rd, 2007, 07:35 PM
Why would you call him when you two are using the same computer to post on the messageboard? Wouldn't it just be easier to turn around and ask him if you are indeed his brother and not ford posting under another name?
We DO not track IPs but we do track multiple screen names which use the same computer. We don't need any sybil multi-personality types confusing people.
That's pretty interesting that you can track people by their computer. The fact is that Ford was at a political meeting while I was watching the kids for an hour. I signed in on his laptop. Now I'm at home on my computer. What does your system tell you now? I think that Fords conspiracy theories about how intrusive the government has become is evident in this post you made.
So you like to track peoples computer huh?
Time to get a life pal!
I love my bro and he can get out of hand at times but he is dead on about you people and the crap you pull. You just convinced me that censorship is alive and well on this site, just like he said it was.
Bubba
May 23rd, 2007, 07:37 PM
Oh yea and you never answered my question about why your buddy here can say ejaculate on a persons face but Ford cant say cream doughnut!
Bubba
May 23rd, 2007, 07:41 PM
Should i sign on from my computer in the bedroom too so you know its not Ford. Unbelievable!!
yokes
May 23rd, 2007, 08:45 PM
Oh yea and you never answered my question about why your buddy here can say ejaculate on a persons face but Ford cant say cream doughnut!
because thats not what Ford said that got him banned..
scooter1251
May 23rd, 2007, 08:49 PM
Who cares what puter bub you are only going to stickup for your scum bag bro lol.....
therising
May 23rd, 2007, 09:41 PM
I also think all of you on this site are a bit off your rocker with little else to do. You should have bigger things to worry about if you ask me.
You ARE right in that this should be a complete non-issue. Truth is no one cares about it, but you're the one that's keeping it alive.
scooter1251
May 23rd, 2007, 10:34 PM
Well looks as if we want to bash or slander Mr.Beckwith well lats start a new post and keep this one where it was to belong. But Mr. Beckwith always slanders on this site or Hamburg First.Check out all the Frontier School Board stuff he slander Comerford,figiel ,and Lalka just read the crap he put up.He thought Mr. Schreckengost would get votes by slandering Lalka to get the third seat ,but the taxpayers knew what a low life Ford was.He thought Primary Chellenge would be good to back his man but that also failed. Ford was so low he even went down to check the voting machines I herd after Mr.Schreckengost got spanked.Then I herd Ford had a job with Erie County Water and screwed that up with in months.This man is unreal if he moved out of THIS STATE they would throw a party.
WNYresident
May 24th, 2007, 07:20 PM
hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com no longer exists.
We have enough hypocrites, liers and what not in government as it is. It was confirmed FJB/Bubba are one in the same. I have no time for people like him.
atotaltotalfan2001
May 24th, 2007, 07:36 PM
http://hamburgfirst.speakupwny.com/
Most of you read his comments he made.
Do you believe I was wrong putting them into the "posts to review" forum?
No, I don't think that was wrong. In fact, I think it was a tame reaction. I hate that he is allowed to pollute this site. I wish he could be banned, but I understand (although don't agree) with the reasons for not doing so.
He is a disgrace to the right of freedom of expression, and the worst kind of backstabber to boot.
He is horrible. Just horrible.:mad:
atotaltotalfan2001
May 24th, 2007, 07:42 PM
That's pretty interesting that you can track people by their computer. The fact is that Ford was at a political meeting while I was watching the kids for an hour. I signed in on his laptop. Now I'm at home on my computer. What does your system tell you now? I think that Fords conspiracy theories about how intrusive the government has become is evident in this post you made.
So you like to track peoples computer huh?
Time to get a life pal!
I love my bro and he can get out of hand at times but he is dead on about you people and the crap you pull. You just convinced me that censorship is alive and well on this site, just like he said it was.
Alas, perhaps it is time for him to leave?
Nah. He'd rather harass Rez......
PAC police
May 24th, 2007, 09:42 PM
Poor Ford if only He could use his thought in a constuctive way. Hard worker great thinker not bad the price to be a leader noby home. Too bad.
I agree no censorship should go on, but in Fords case Maybe lol Larry A. is a flaming *** but life in my world will go forward ty
FJB
May 24th, 2007, 09:43 PM
It was confirmed FJB/Bubba are one in the same.
This is a complete lie.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.